Quantcast
Channel: Bikers Of America, Know Your Rights!
Viewing all 6498 articles
Browse latest View live

CA - Law enforcement demands smartphone 'kill switch'

$
0
0
OFF THE WIRE

CA - Helmet Law Protest July 14th

$
0
0
OFF THE WIRE
A very special Event showing how we continue to stand up in court against the unconstitutional “application” of
California’s helmet law – and to honor all the Fighters
 
Sunday, July 14th, 2013- Escondido
  10 a.m. Breakfast – $7.00 – American Legion Escondido
        230 East Park Ave, next to the Senior Center
       Any additional donation will benefit local MRO. 
 For more info contact

                                                        
Dave  760-975-5953


mcdavecc@aol.com
                                   Do it to honor those who no longer can…
                                                           
    




    
 


USA - POLICE PROFILING PATCHES

$
0
0
OFF THE WIRE

If you ride a motorcycle and you are a member of a club, wear club support clothing or have club support stickers on your helmet or bike you probably have been pulled over by some dirty cop who has it in for anyone wearing club stuff. And during that traffic stop your rights were violated, you were treated as a criminal, had the officer make-up charges against you, lie about what happened or what you said, handcuffed for no reason, abused, degraded and spoken to with profanity, threaten, and treated with disrespect.
What the site is all about; the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution which guarantees the right to be safe from unreasonable search and seizure without probable cause and the Fourteenth Amendment which requires that all citizens be treated equally under the law.

Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
What we are fighting:
Profiling, according to the Washington State Legislature’s current policies, occurs when law enforcement targets an individual exhibiting characteristics of a class that an officer believes more likely than others to commit a crime. The practice of targeting an individual because they are riding a motorcycle or wearing motorcycle paraphernalia is a perfect example of profiling. (Definition of profiling in SB 5852 passed in 2002.) From Motorcycle Profiling in Washington State, we are fighting the fight here. It’s time to stand up and be heard.
This is the place for you to vent, share your story or ask a question.

USA - Bill Would Restore GI Bill for Older Vets

$
0
0
OFF THE WIRE
Terry Howell
According to an AP report, the Senate may soon have the chance to vote on whether or not to remove the time limit for GI Bill benefits. Currently veterans have 10 years to use their Montgomery GI Bill (or 15 years to use their Post-9/11 GI Bill). The so-called delimiting date is determined by the veterans last discharge date.
Senator Richard Blumenthal announced his new bill on Tuesday May 28, saying the new bill that would repeal the “unfair and arbitrary time  limits.”
Blumenthal  said more than 2 million veterans who missed the 10-year expiration date have been denied the benefits despite paying  the required Montgomery GI Bill  enrollment fee of  $1,200.While the bill would not have an immediate effect on Post-9/11 vets, it would restore the GI Bill for many Vietnam, Cold-War, and Gulf-War era veterans who were unable to take advantage of their benefits within the 10 years after discharge.

CA - Lane Splitting General Guidelines...

$
0
0
Lane splitting in a safe and prudent manner is not illegal in the state of California.
The term lane splitting, sometimes known as lane sharing, filtering or white-lining, refers to the process of a motorcyclist riding between lanes of stopped or slower moving traffic or moving between lanes to the front of traffic stopped at a traffic light.
Motorcyclists who are competent enough riders to lane split, should follow these general guidelines if choosing to lane split:
1) Travel at a speed that is no more than 10 MPH faster than other traffic – danger increases at higher speed differentials.
- A speed differential of 10 miles per hour or less allows an alert, competent rider enough time to identify and react to most dangerous situations that can occur.
- The greater the speed differential, the less time a rider has to identify and react to a hazard.
2) It is not advisable to lane split when traffic flow is at 30 mph or faster --- danger increases as overall speed increases.
- At just 20 mph, in the 1 or 2 seconds it takes a rider to identify a hazard, that rider will travel approximately 30 to 60 feet before even starting to take evasive action. Actual reaction (braking or swerving) will take additional time and distance.
- Braking and stopping distance varies greatly based on a multitude of factors (rider, machine and environment).
- As speed increases, crash severity increases.
3) Typically, it is safer to split between the #1 and #2 lanes than between other lanes.
- Other road users are more accustomed to motorcycles splitting between the #1 and #2 (furthest left) lanes.
- Avoid splitting in lanes near freeway on-ramps and exits.
- Avoid splitting lanes when another motorcycle rider is splitting between other nearby lanes as cars may make additional room for one rider and accidentally reduce space for another.
4) Consider the total environment in which you are splitting, including the width of the lanes, size of surrounding vehicles, as well as roadway, weather, and lighting conditions.
- Some lanes are narrower than others, leaving little room to pass safely. If you can't fit, don't split.
- Some vehicles are wider than others -- it is not advisable to split near wide trucks. If you can't fit, don't split.
- Know the limitations of your motorcycle --- wide bars, fairing and bags require more space between vehicles. If you can't fit, don't split.
- Avoid splitting on unfamiliar roads to avoid surprises such as poor road surfaces.
- Seams in the pavement or concrete between lanes can be hazardous if they are wide or uneven.
- Poor visibility, due to darkness or weather conditions, makes it difficult for riders to see road hazards and makes it more difficult for drivers to see you.
- Help drivers see you by wearing brightly colored protective gear and using high beams during daylight.
5) Be alert and anticipate possible movements by other road users.
- Be very aware of what the cars around you are doing. If a space, or gap, opens up next to your lane, be prepared react accordingly.
- Always be prepared to take evasive action if a vehicle changes lanes.
- Account for inattentive or distracted drivers.
- Riders should not weave back and forth between lanes or ride on top of the line.
- Riders should avoid lingering in blind spots.
- Never ride while impaired by drugs, alcohol or fatigue.
- Constantly scan for changing conditions.


The Four R's or “Be-Attitudes” of Lane Splitting:
Be Reasonable, be Responsible, be Respectful, be aware of all Roadway and traffic conditions.
- Be Reasonable means not more than 10 MPH faster than traffic flow and not over 39 MPH.


- Be Responsible for your own safety and decisions.

        Don't put yourself in dangerous positions.
        If you can't fit, don't split.
- Be Respectful --- sharing the road goes both ways.
  • Don't rely on loud pipes to keep you safe, loud pipes often startle people and poison the attitude of car drivers toward motorcyclists.
  • Other vehicles are not required to make space for motorcycles to lane split.
- Be aware Roadways and traffic can be hazardous.
  • uneven pavement
  • wide trucks
  • distracted drivers
  • weather conditions
  • curves
  • etc.
Disclaimers:

These general guidelines are not guaranteed to keep you safe.
Lane splitting should not be performed by inexperienced riders. These guidelines assume a high level of riding competency and experience.
The recommendations contained here are only general guidelines and cannot cover all possible combinations of situations and variables.
Personal Safety: Every rider has ultimate responsibility for his or her own decision making and safety. Riders must be conscious of reducing crash risk at all times. California law requires all motorcycle riders and passengers wear a helmet that complies with the DOT FMVSS 218 standard.
Risk of getting a ticket: Motorcyclists who lane split are not relieved of the responsibility to obey all existing traffic laws. With respect to possible law enforcement action, keep in mind that it will be up to the discretion of the Law Enforcement Officer to determine if riding behavior while lane splitting is or was safe and prudent.

When is it NOT OK to split?
You should NOT lane split:
- If you can't fit.
- At a toll booth.
- If traffic is moving too fast or unpredictably.
- If dangerous road conditions exist --- examples include water or grit on the road, slippery road markings, road construction, uneven pavement, metal grates, etc.
- If you cannot clearly see a way out of the space you're going into (for example, if a van or SUV is blocking your view).
- Between trucks, buses, RVs, and other wide vehicles.
- Around or through curves.
- If you are not fully alert and aware of your surroundings.
- If you are unable to react to changing conditions instantaneously.
- If you don't feel comfortable with the situation.
 Messages for Other Vehicle Drivers
1) Lane splitting by motorcycles is not illegal in California when done in a safe and prudent manner.

2) Motorists should not take it upon themselves to discourage motorcyclists from lane splitting.

3) Intentionally blocking or impeding a motorcyclist in a way that could cause harm to the rider is illegal (CVC 22400).

4) Opening a vehicle door to impede a motorcycle is illegal (CVC 22517).

5) Never drive while distracted.

6) You can help keep motorcyclists and all road users safe by





  • Checking mirrors and blind spots, especially before changing lanes or turning
  • Signaling your intentions before changing lanes or merging with traffic
  • Allowing more following distance, three or four seconds, when behind a motorcycle so the motorcyclist has enough time to maneuver or stop in an emergency
  • CALIFORNIA - Bikers love it. Car drivers hate it.

    $
    0
    0
    OFF THE WIRE

    http://cencalbiker.com/Abate-update-0113.html
    Bikers love it. Car drivers hate it.

    Regardless of your position, there will now be less hair-splitting over lane splitting, also known as lane sharing. The California Highway Patrol recently released guidelines to define safe lane splitting, which allows motorcyclists to pass slowed or stopped vehicles under certain conditions.
    Prior to the release of the guidelines, the practice of lane splitting was at best vaguely defined in the state’s vehicle code. Few other states even allow it, and the new guidelines, which can be viewed online at chp.ca.gov/programs/lanesplitguide; more clearly elaborates the CHP’s dos and don’ts on lane splitting.
    ABATE is very pleased to see the CHP take this step. The new guidelines discourage lane splitting when traffic is moving 30 mph or faster or moving through stalled traffic at high speeds. Motorcyclists are now encouraged to limit their speed to no more than 10 mph faster than surrounding traffic. The new rules apply to auto and truck drivers as well.
    The guidelines remind them that it is illegal to block a lane splitting motorcycle in a way that could cause harm to the rider and warns them not to “take the law into their own hands,” and attempting to discourage motorcyclists from lane splitting. Most automobile operators don’t realize that motorcycles are not designed to idle for long periods of time and can overheat, especially in the heat of summer.
    I think if you asked most bikers they would agree with the new guidelines, and generally agree with the “safe and prudent” recommendations. A good rule of thumb also is to not split lanes unless traffic is completely stopped. You never know when a car is going to make a sudden lane change ahead of you, leaving little or no time to react. For more information on lane splitting, visit www.abate.org

    How and Why Motorcycle Lane Splitting is Safe and Good - RideApart

    $
    0
    0
    OFF THE WIRE
     VIDEO LINK BELOW
     http://youtu.be/JNGD9AAIfFU
    Motorcycles riding between cars! Calm down, the legal practice of lane splitting saves car drivers time and money by reducing overall congestion while allowing motorcycles to take charge of their own safety. Here's why everyone, including car drivers, should support legal lane splitting.

    Jamie and a Triumph Street Triple are joined by Harlan Flagg of electric motorcycle dealer Hollywood Electrics and Wes returns from injury on a Suzuki GSX-R600.

    For more on motorcycles, check out http://RideApart.com

    Lane Splitting General Guidelines For Motorcycles

    $
    0
    0
    OFF THE WIRE

    Lane splitting in a safe and prudent manner is not illegal in the state of California.

    The term lane splitting, sometimes known as lane sharing, filtering or white-lining, refers to the process of a motorcyclist riding between lanes of stopped or slower moving traffic or moving between lanes to the front of traffic stopped at a traffic light. 
    Lane splitting in a safe and prudent manner is not illegal in the state of California.
    The term lane splitting, sometimes known as lane sharing, filtering or white-lining, refers to the process of a motorcyclist riding between lanes of stopped or slower moving traffic or moving between lanes to the front of traffic stopped at a traffic light.
    Motorcyclists who are competent enough riders to lane split, should follow these general guidelines if choosing to lane split:
    1) Travel at a speed that is no more than 10 MPH faster than other traffic– danger increases at higher speed differentials. 
    - A speed differential of 10 miles per hour or less allows an alert, competent rider enough time to identify and react to most dangerous situations that can occur. 
    - The greater the speed differential, the less time a rider has to identify and react to a hazard. 
    2) It is not advisable to lane split when traffic flow is at 30 mph or faster --- danger increases as overall speed increases. 
    - At just 20 mph, in the 1 or 2 seconds it takes a rider to identify a hazard, that rider will travel approximately 30 to 60 feet before even starting to take evasive action. Actual reaction (braking or swerving) will take additional time and distance. 
    - Braking and stopping distance varies greatly based on a multitude of factors (rider, machine and environment). 
    - As speed increases, crash severity increases. 
    3) Typically, it is safer to split between the #1 and #2 lanes than between other lanes. 
    - Other road users are more accustomed to motorcycles splitting between the #1 and #2 (furthest left) lanes. 
    - Avoid splitting in lanes near freeway on-ramps and exits. 
    - Avoid splitting lanes when another motorcycle rider is splitting between other nearby lanes as cars may make additional room for one rider and accidentally reduce space for another. 
    4) Consider the total environment in which you are splitting, including the width of the lanes, size of surrounding vehicles, as well as roadway, weather, and lighting conditions. 
    - Some lanes are narrower than others, leaving little room to pass safely. If you can't fit, don't split. 
    - Some vehicles are wider than others -- it is not advisable to split near wide trucks. If you can't fit, don't split. 
    - Know the limitations of your motorcycle --- wide bars, fairing and bags require more space between vehicles. If you can't fit, don't split. 
    - Avoid splitting on unfamiliar roads to avoid surprises such as poor road surfaces. 
    - Seams in the pavement or concrete between lanes can be hazardous if they are wide or uneven. 
    - Poor visibility, due to darkness or weather conditions, makes it difficult for riders to see road hazards and makes it more difficult for drivers to see you. 
    - Help drivers see you by wearing brightly colored protective gear and using high beams during daylight. 
    5) Be alert and anticipate possible movements by other road users. 
    - Be very aware of what the cars around you are doing. If a space, or gap, opens up next to your lane, be prepared react accordingly. 
    - Always be prepared to take evasive action if a vehicle changes lanes. 
    - Account for inattentive or distracted drivers. 
    - Riders should not weave back and forth between lanes or ride on top of the line. 
    - Riders should avoid lingering in blind spots. 
    - Never ride while impaired by drugs, alcohol or fatigue. 
    - Constantly scan for changing conditions. 
    The Four R's or “Be-Attitudes” of Lane Splitting:
    Be Reasonable, be Responsible, be Respectful, be aware of all Roadway and traffic conditions. 
    - Be Reasonable means not more than 10 MPH faster than traffic flow and not over 39 MPH. 
    - Be Responsible for your own safety and decisions. 
    Don't put yourself in dangerous positions. 
    If you can't fit, don't split. 
    - Be Respectful --- sharing the road goes both ways. 
    Don't rely on loud pipes to keep you safe, loud pipes often startle people and poison the attitude of car drivers toward motorcyclists. 
    Other vehicles are not required to make space for motorcycles to lane split. 
    - Be aware Roadways and traffic can be hazardous. 
    uneven pavement
    wide trucks
    distracted drivers 
    weather conditions 
    curves
    etc.
    Disclaimers:  
    These general guidelines are not guaranteed to keep you safe. 
    Lane splitting should not be performed by inexperienced riders. These guidelines assume a high level of riding competency and experience. 
    The recommendations contained here are only general guidelines and cannot cover all possible combinations of situations and variables. 
    Personal Safety: Every rider has ultimate responsibility for his or her own decision making and safety. Riders must be conscious of reducing crash risk at all times. California law requires all motorcycle riders and passengers wear a helmet that complies with the DOT FMVSS 218 standard. 
    Risk of getting a ticket: Motorcyclists who lane split are not relieved of the responsibility to obey all existing traffic laws. With respect to possible law enforcement action, keep in mind that it will be up to the discretion of the Law Enforcement Officer to determine if riding behavior while lane splitting is or was safe and prudent. 
    When is it NOT OK to split? 
    You should NOT lane split: 
    - If you can't fit. 
    - At a toll booth. 
    - If traffic is moving too fast or unpredictably. 
    - If dangerous road conditions exist --- examples include water or grit on the road, slippery road markings, road construction, uneven pavement, metal grates, etc. 
    - If you cannot clearly see a way out of the space you're going into (for example, if a van or SUV is blocking your view). 
    - Between trucks, buses, RVs, and other wide vehicles. 
    - Around or through curves. 
    - If you are not fully alert and aware of your surroundings. 
    - If you are unable to react to changing conditions instantaneously. 
    - If you don't feel comfortable with the situation. 
     
    Messages for Other Vehicle Drivers 
    1) Lane splitting by motorcycles is not illegal in California when done in a safe and prudent manner. 
    2) Motorists should not take it upon themselves to discourage motorcyclists from lane splitting. 
    3) Intentionally blocking or impeding a motorcyclist in a way that could cause harm to the rider is illegal (CVC 22400). 
    4) Opening a vehicle door to impede a motorcycle is illegal (CVC 22517). 
    5) Never drive while distracted. 
    6) You can help keep motorcyclists and all road users safe by 
    •  Checking mirrors and blind spots, especially before changing lanes or turning 
    •  Signaling your intentions before changing lanes or merging with traffic 
    •  Allowing more following distance, three or four seconds, when behind a motorcycle so the motorcyclist has enough time to maneuver or stop in an emergency 


    What Constitutes Probable Cause?

    $
    0
    0
    OFF THE WIRE

    LindaSexton
    Linda Sexton began her writing career in 2001 when she created her company's first newsletter. She also writes two blogs, classic movie reviews, short stories and poetry. Sexton has a Bachelor of Arts in Medieval studies from Southern Methodist University, and is finishing her Master of Arts in Icelandic studies.



    What Constitutes Probable Cause?thumbnail


     Our Founding Fathers ensured the people's right against illegal search and seizure.


    Probable cause originates from the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, with the intent to prohibit inappropriate search and seizure by the government. Our Founding Fathers' experience with British authorities randomly stopping, seizing and searching individuals without cause gave them motive to guard against it in the new government. Further, no warrants shall be issued without probable cause or support by the courts. General warrants were replaced with documents that stated specific parameters of what is to be searched and where.
    Related Searches:
      • Where there are grounds for suspecting an individual has committed a crime, there should be probable cause for making a charge against the accused. As defined by the U.S. Constitution's Fourth Amendment, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

      Civil and Criminal

      • Necessary in both criminal and civil law to prosecute or support a claim, probable cause becomes essential in the application of criminal law. When levying a claim in civil court, the consequences involve only the loss of property; the defendant may also counter-sue if the plaintiff cannot prove the case. In criminal law, however, the defendant not only faces the loss of property, but the action may lead to the loss of individual liberty.

      Reasonable Suspicion

      • Probable cause must be present for law enforcement to arrest and prosecute an individual. This does not mean, however, that an officer must have absolute certainty that a crime has taken place to detain someone. While absolute guilt is rarely present, officers can restrain an individual to conduct further investigations. This exception to the probable cause standard allows law enforcement to stop, investigate or frisk an individual based on the officer's experience, training and reasonable suspicion. Reasonable suspicion is less than probable cause, but is enough knowledge to lead a reasonably cautious person to believe a crime has occurred.

      Justification

      • How much evidence must be present to constitute probable cause depends on circumstances. If an officer stops an individual because his car has an expired inspection sticker, the officer would not have justification for searching the vehicle or its occupants. If, however, while addressing the driver the officer sees in plain view a bag that appears to contain an illegal substance, probable cause is present to search the inside of the vehicle as well as the individuals in the car.

      Plain View

      • Most state laws allow an officer or any other person to arrest an individual when a felony or offense against the public peace is committed in their view. A warrant is not necessary, as the probable cause would be part of witnessing the act itself. Defense to any repercussions for arresting without a warrant is that the officer or individual acted in good faith under prudent and reasonable standards.
      • References
      • Top 5 To Try



    What Is Jury Nullification?

    $
    0
    0
    OFF THE WIRE
    From Station.6.Underground
    What is Jury Nullification? You won’t find it defined in your dictionary or described in your encyclopedia. You weren’t taught about it in school, and indeed it is even considered a crime to tell other people about it in some circumstances. Imagine that for a moment – it is a crime to inform a citizen as to their right, even the scope of their duty while serving on a jury.
    According to the Wikipedia entry:
    Jury nullification is a constitutional doctrine which allows juries to acquit criminal defendants who are technically guilty, but who do not deserve punishment. It occurs in a trial when a jury reaches a verdict contrary to the judge’s instructions as to the law. 
    A jury verdict contrary to the letter of the law pertains only to the particular case before it. If a pattern of acquittals develops, however, in response to repeated attempts to prosecute a statutory offence, this can have the de facto effect of invalidating the statute. A pattern of jury nullification may indicate public opposition to an unwanted legislative enactment…
    Most Americans have never even heard of such a doctrine. Thanks to numerous TV shows and real-life judges telling us that the only function of the jury is to render a decision based strictly upon the facts of the case, a key tenet of the justice system envisioned by the Founding Fathers has been lost. You see, it is not only the job of the jury to weigh guilt or innocence against the letter of the law, but also to judge the just nature of the statutes themselves. In this way, The People ultimately retain power over the government, rather than the government dictating to The People what is and what is not justice. This tenet is instrumental in protecting ourselves, as The People, from tyrannical laws and cronyism. This is why we have a jury system in the first place, not simply to act as a cog in the wheel of the justice system, but to be the justice in the system.
    Let us imagine for a moment, that you live in a city where the Mayor makes soda-pop illegal. So illegal that he actually signs into law a criminal statute that makes it a jailable offense to dispense soda-pop. He makes a public campaign to warn about the evils of soda-pop, how detrimental it is to your health, while being crowned king of national doughnut day, and holding a vast amount stock in the city’s number-one importer of iced-tea.
    Fascist Food and Nutrition Nazis
    Now let us imagine that you are sitting on the jury for a criminal trial of a single-mom arrested for selling soda-pop to her neighbor, which had been “smuggled” in from outside of the city limits, and that the transaction was captured on an audio-video recording by police. You see that she is plainly guilty of violating the law, technically, but can’t in good-conscience send her off to jail for a year. You, and other jury members voice that dilemma to the judge, who then instructs you to render a verdict based strictly on the facts of the case, the evidence presented, and that all other considerations have no bearing on your duty to render a verdict. What do you do? It appears that you have no choice, and you find her guilty.
    But if you had actually been a FULLY INFORMED JUROR, rather than just listening to the instructions of the judge who owed his career to the Mayor, you would have known that you did have an alternative. That it was not actually illegal for you to ignore the judge’s instructions, and that you could have rendered a verdict based on your conscience rather than a law in a book. You would have known that Jury Nullification not only gives you this right, but that it is your duty as a juror to render your verdict in such a manner. In this way, you see, not only have you protected the accused from overzealous and tyrannical prosecution, but you have also struck a blow against cronyism. Cronyism by the Mayor who stands to make a profit from the law he made, in relation to the company stocks he owns and the companies that own him. Cronyism by police and prosecutors who turn a profit on the backs of the taxpayers for every arrest and prosecution they make, maintaining their job security and giving the United States the largest prison population in the world in the process.
    Imagine how many ridiculous laws would be suddenly rendered obsolete. Imagine how many frivolous prosecutions would be avoided. Imagine how many people would not be sitting in prison today for victimless crimes. Imagine how much lower your taxes would be if you didn’t have to pay for all this nonsense. Imagine how powerless the government would suddenly find itself, in the face of a population that was no longer going to take any of their shit.
    Maybe that’s why the principle of Jury Nullification is the most taboo subject in our justice system today, and has been continually eroded in landmark decisions by the courts since 1895, as time has distanced us from the core principles of liberty on which this nation was founded.
    In 1794, the case of Georgia v. Brailsford was being heard before the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). The court’s first Chief Justice, John Jay, established precedent that the Common Law practice of Jury Nullification was valid in the United States. He wrote, in part…
    “It may not be amiss, here, Gentlemen, to remind you of the good old
    rule, that on questions of fact, it is the province of the jury, on
    questions of law, it is the province of the court to decide. But it must
    be observed that by the same law, which recognizes this reasonable
    distribution of jurisdiction, you have nevertheless a right to take upon
    yourselves to judge of both, and to determine the law as well as the fact in controversy.
    On this, and on every other occasion, however, we
    have no doubt, you will pay that respect, which is due to the opinion of
    the court: For, as on the one hand, it is presumed, that juries are the
    best judges of facts; it is, on the other hand, presumbable, that the
    court are the best judges of the law. But still both objects are
    lawfully, within your power of decision.”
    That precedent held, unmolested, for 99 years. Prior to the Civil War, the Fugitive Slave Act made it a Federal Crime to help escaped slaves, but jury nullification was instrumental in undermining that law and bringing an end to slavery America. Jurors refused to render a guilty verdict against those who had helped escaped slaves. But in 1895, the Supreme Court of the United States struck it’s first blow against the Common Law principle of Jury Nullification. In Sparf v. United States, SCOTUS held in a 5-4 decision that federal judges were not required to inform jurors of their inherent right to judge the law in a case.
    In the 1969, the Fourth Circuit upheld in the case of U.S. v. Moylan that a court could refuse to allow instruction to a jury regarding nullification, yet hypocritically upheld the jurors inherent right to nullify. In other words, they were denying the right of the juror to be informed of their right, while still maintaining the validity of Jury Nullification stating,
    “If the jury feels the law is unjust, we recognize the undisputed power of
    the jury to acquit.”
    In the 1972 case of United States v Dougherty  the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit maintained that the courts could deny the defense a chance to instruct a jury on their right to nullify.
    In 1988, in U.S. v. Krzyske, the jury asked the judge about jury nullification. The judge responded “There is no such thing as valid jury nullification.” The jury convicted the defendant, and the judge’s answer was upheld on appeal. Another judge did dissent however, and cited United States v. Wilson, 629 F. 2d 439 – Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit 1980, that the panel had unanimously decided “In criminal cases, a jury is entitled to acquit the defendant because it has no sympathy for the government’s position.”
    In 1997, the Second Circuit ruled that jurors can be removed if there is evidence that they intend to nullify the law, under Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 23(b). There have even been instances of jurors being removed and mistrials declared after informed-jury activists distributed literature near courthouses.
    Now here’s one final gut-check for the uninformed public. We often assume that it is the job of the defense attorney to defend their client to the best of their ability, with all of the knowledge at their disposal. This is not true, however. Attorneys, including defense attorneys, are an Officer of the Court. This means that their first duty is to the law, and not their client. With a sworn oath to uphold the law, they are forbidden from advocating jury nullification. Your lawyer works for the court, not you.
    If you ever sit on a jury, remember one important fact. You do not work for the court.
    Lawmall.com
    A History of Jury Nullification
    The Straight Dope
    stationsixunderground@gmail.com

    USA - Coming down the track like a freight train.

    $
    0
    0
    OFF THE WIRE
    Autonomous driving technology largely or we’d say has been only limited to cars, until now. BMW and Honda have already been featuring connectivity technologies in their cars and now plan to shift the technology onto their motorcycles.
    Both these automobile giants are working with the University of Michigan and Australian startup venture Codha Wireless to implement autonomous driving technologies into their motorcycles. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, USA states that though only 5 percent of driving fatalities involved a motorcycle, the injury percentage stands at a high 80 percent of all motorcycle accidents.
    Known as vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I), the technology was earlier confined to equip self-driving cars of the future, but would be transferred to motorcycles. A total of 3000 connected vehicles are under trial by the University of Michigan Transportation Institute (UMTRI) in the city of Ann Arbor with BMW and Honda motorcycles now adding to the tally.
    Like cars, the technology on motorcycles would allow bikes to ‘talk; to traffic lights, roadside signs and cars. A long-range secure form of Wi-Fi would enable the motorcycle to communicate with a car much before the drivers see each other while approaching a blind intersection. A set of green and red lights on the dash mounted instrument panel would report and warn riders while approaching intersections and blind corners. The technology would also benefit electric motorcycles notifying the riders of the nearest power stations and choose the most energy efficient routes to their destinations based on traffic conditions. (Brilliant!)
    The technology has struck favours with and attracted strategic investments from giants like Cisco Systems and NXP Semiconductors. In fact Cisco is already using Codha software at its roadside V2I gateways, while NXP and Codha are into collaboration for having jointly developed radio chips installed in cars running connectivity technologies.
    In a situation where motorcycle fatalities have been rising year by year, if this technology could manage to even bring down the numbers even my a marginal percentage- it would mean saving thousands of invaluable lives if the numbers are considered on a global scale. Great initiative that!

    Espinoza's Leather Story and Bios..

    $
    0
    0
     AFTER TALKING WITH FELLA`S AND LEARNING ABOUT THEM, THEY MAKE ALL THE  CLUB CUTS// LET MAKE YOURS, CHECK THEM OUT.... NUFF SAID....
    JUST LET THE ESPINOSA`S, KNOW THAT YOU SAW IT HERE..
    MLH&R
    SCREWDRIVER


    Philip,
    It was a pleasure meeting you (electronically) and an honor to be on your show. Per you request I have enclosed both the REVOLUCION magazine article and the bio from our website which combined give some background and facts of our shop and history. Just below are the bios of each member in chronological order. Thank you once again for your interest in our business and the opportunity to reach out to your fans.
    Regards,
    Joe Espinoza

    ________    THE CAST________
    Gilberto Espinoza, SR
    Owner/Founder
    Rides 2010 Street Glide Trike
    Gilbert Espinoza JR
    First Son - Works at Shop weekends and Events
    Rides 2010 Fatboy
    Joe Espinoza
    Second Son - Works many evenings, weekends and shows/events
    Rides 2000 Softail Duece
    Eric Espinoza
    Youngest - Works full time at Shop and all events/shows
    Rides 2010 Street Bob
    Revolucion Magazine Article

    Gilberto, Joe, Gilbert Jr. and Eric Espinoza of Espinoza’s Leather tell their story: one of sacrifice and hard work that spreads over three generations.

    The vest is sacred throughout the biker world and without saying a word it communicates who we are, where we come from and whom we ride with whether in a group or solo. When Gilberto Espinoza started making leather bracelets and belts after a farmer strike in 1971, he had no idea that it would eventually lead him, and later his three sons, down a path to becoming one of the industry’s most respected makers of biker vests and leathers. But the story of this family-run business goes far beyond leather hides and sewn-on patches. Their story is of one man making sacrifices for his family, only to have his family do the same in return to take care of him. This is the story of Gilberto Espinoza, a quiet and humble man, as told by his three sons, Joe, Gilbert Jr. and Eric.

    How did you start making leather goods?
    Joe

    My dad left his home when he was only 8 years old. He made his way from his childhood home near central Mexico  to Tijuana. After some diffucult years he made it into America where he started working as a meat cutter and that’s when he met my mom. My mother’s father was dabbling in belts and leather goods and my dad saw an opportunity to start his own business. He started out making berrets, key chains and bracelets with individual’s name stamped in them. We have pictures of a huge mountain of bracelets where people would come, pick one and we’d stamp in their name. The cost was one dollar and the stamp was free. That’s how my dad’s business first started in ’71.
    Gilberto (The Father)
    I started my business back in 1971. I was a meat cutter. One time the farmers went on strike and there was no more meat to cut. My father-in-law told me why don’t you go to the store get some leather, make some belts and wallets and sell them at the swap meet. While there I met a lot of bikers who would ask me to do little repairs and some other custom items. That’s how I first started working with bikers.
    Joe
    My Father started this business in the garage with a couple of wooden tables and a machine we still use today. My dad would be stamping out leather all day and my brother and I would paint the edges. My brother and I sacrificed every summer traveling to all the state fairs. There was one summer we had to work 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. and 10 a.m. to midnight on the weekends. We grew up in that world. We didn’t really see it as a bad thing. It’s just what we did. Little did we know, that 40 years later we’d have this huge retail place with customers from all over the world.
    Gilbert Jr.

    My dad’s first customers were at the La Mirada swap meet. A guy named Popeye introduced us to the biker scene. We started with only one table and a Dodge Charger. My parents would have to sit in the Charger because we didn’t have a canopy for shade. My dad would always say “I know it’s tough on you guys but in the end it will benefit you.” Sure enough my dad has proven that to be true.
    Eric
    I was the youngest so I was a little more spoiled and started at age 12.  I wasn’t ready to run the business but I had a general knowledge of how things worked. Joe taught me how to measure so we helped each other. Now I’m here everyday taking care of the customers. People come from everywhere. We had a guy come down from Switzerland just to buy an Espinoza T-shirt. Over the years my dad has built a steady clientele. We offer the type of customization others can’t. We can take a basic vest and do whatever you want with it. You might have a small chest and a big belly, but we can make a vest that fits right. That’s what my dad offers to the people that no one else can.
    When it comes to the Chicano-style riders, the style has always been clean cut with ironed pants and shirts and never looking grungy. We always presented our bikes and ourselves the right way. That’s how we were as Chicano men back in the day and as time progressed that’s how we still are. Chicano men tend to want the longer vest that is fitted and looking good. They don’t want to go and buy a tiny vest. Also we treat everyone as family and with respect no matter what background you come from.
    Joe

    As you can see it’s always been a family business so it doesn’t feel like work, just spending time with the family. Eric is 100% like my dad. He has that type of personality that makes people want to come in and talk to him for hours. He acts exactly how my dad does by spending a lot of time with customers, but now my dad gets on his case for doing the exact same thing! (laughs). Two years ago I tried to figure out how to launch a Web site for a mass market. You can’t. How do you show a 100% custom experience to a mass market? The way I try to appeal to the public is to explain why it’s worth it to take a ride here whether you’re in San Diego, San Francisco or other surrounding states. Whenever you’re in California, come on in. I’ve been trying to get the word out that to wear an Espinoza cut is to have something special. We must be doing something right because we realize it’s more than a business when my dad shows up to an event and a crowd surrounds him. They all want to say hi to my pops. That’s when you know it’s more than making cuts for riders. Funny part is, my dad hates crowds and usually tells me ‘Mijo get me a beer’. They love you, huh dad?

    Gilberto
    The people they love me (big laughs).
    Does the family ride together also?
    Eric
    My dad stopped riding in 1991 until about 3 years ago when I started working full time for him. Watching a pack of bikes leave the shop everyday, I’d get so pissed off and say “I need a bike! I need a bike!” I kept telling my dad I need a co-signer. (laughs) He finally said OK. I bought a 2010 Dyna Street Bob. I guess I was watching too much Sons of Anarchy. (laughs) When my dad was there with me, he fell in love with a trike and bought it on the spot.
    Joe

    I went with them just for moral support and sat on a Softail. I bought it that same day also. Two months later my brother ( Gilbert Jr.) bought a motorcycle and eventually, his son Gilbert III, bought a bike–now all three generations ride.

    Gilberto - Final Thought...Thank you all for your business. 
    ________
    ESPINOZAS LEATHER WEBSITE BIO
    Starting in 1971 with the manufacturing of leather bracelets and barrettes, immigrant Gilberto Espinoza was determined to grow his small one man operation into a prosperous business.
    Soon leather belts, chain wallets and purses made its way into the inventory. The result was growth warranting the opening of a formal manufacturing location. So the garage was returned to the family car and small but suitable shop was found in a strip mall in Rosemead.
    In September of 1985 the first retail store was opened just two short blocks away from the first shop. Espinoza’s Leather Goods retail was born and the offering at the time was the same inventory of wallets and purses with some samplings of import products from Mexico.
    That summer the first motorcycle jacket was made and Gilberto never looked back. Leather jackets, vests and chaps are his passion coupled with customer satisfaction.

    The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution...

    $
    0
    0

    OF THE WIRE

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    The Second Amendment (Amendment II) to the United States Constitution is the part of the United States Bill of Rights that protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, along with the rest of the Bill of Rights.
    In 2008 and 2010, the Supreme Court issued two Second Amendment decisions. In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm, unconnected to service in a militia and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Additionally, the Court enumerated several longstanding prohibitions and restrictions on firearms possession that it found were consistent with the Second Amendment. In McDonald v. Chicago (2010), the Court ruled that the Second Amendment limits state and local governments to the same extent that it limits the federal government.

    Text

    There are several versions of the text of the Second Amendment, each with slight capitalization and punctuation differences, found in the official documents surrounding the adoption of the Bill of Rights. One version was passed by the Congress, while another is found in the copies distributed to the States and then ratified by them.
    As passed by the Congress:
    As ratified by the States and authenticated by Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State:
    The original hand-written copy of the Bill of Rights, approved by the House and Senate, was prepared by scribeWilliam Lambert and resides in the National Archives.

    Source

    Description above from the Wikipedia article Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, licensed under CC-BY-SA full list of contributors here. Community Pages are not affiliated with, or endorsed by, anyone associated with the topic.

    Babes of the Day - This is 18 and older. Rest assured I will offend you and rest assured I don't give a fuck! If you don't like crude hum or and think you will report me don't like my page. For those with the ability to laugh and take a joke welcome.

    Police: Civilians behave better on camera, protects officer.. GOES BOTH WAYS...Officers are required to inform anyone they stop that they are being recorded.

    $
    0
    0
    OFF THE WIRE
    The lightweight devices that attach to an officer’s sunglasses, hat or uniform seem to be defusing some sticky situations before they arise.
    By Andrea Noble
    The Washington Times
    LAUREL, Md. — Police officers nationwide, engaging a smartphone-happy public eager to catalog every potential misstep and post it on YouTube, are donning new accessories — body-mounted video cameras.
    The lightweight devices that attach to an officer's sunglasses, hat or uniform seem to be defusing some sticky situations before they arise.
    "People tend to behave better when they are on video," said New Carrollton Police Chief David Rice, whose 17-member department has used body-mounted cameras for about a year. He said the effect can be seen among both officers and civilians.
    "We're not getting as much combativeness from people. In that respect, it has worked very well," he said.
    The Laurel Police Department, which is testing cameras and will deploy them in coming weeks, is among three municipal agencies in Prince George's County using the cameras both in an effort to protect their own officers from false complaints and to better document evidence for criminal cases.
    "I think every agency is concerned with complaints and wants to make sure their officers are compliant with their policies and procedures," said Laurel Police Deputy Chief James Brooks, explaining one of the benefits of the cameras. "That way you don't have the citizen's word versus the officer's word."
    Camera vendors report that thousands of departments across the country, from Cleveland to Oakland, Calif., have begun to record interactions using body-mounted cameras that go well beyond the limited scope of the more widely popular dashboard cameras used in police cruisers.
    The American Civil Liberties Union of Maryland, which supported the use of dashboard cameras by police as a means to prevent racial profiling during traffic stops, said the cameras could provide further protections for residents — as long as they are used correctly.
    "I do think these cameras serve a very important purpose both to protect the public and to protect police," said David Rocah, staff attorney for the ACLU of Maryland. "But the officers don't always turn them on."
    In California, for example, a standoff last year between Oakland police and Occupy Oakland protesters resulted in an investigation of camera-wearing officers' actions after photos and video surfaced which showed several officers involved in crowd control efforts whose cameras were not recording, according to the East Bay Express.
    The use of body-mounted cameras in Maryland also raises questions about the legality of the recordings, Mr. Rocah said. Maryland is one of several states that requires consent by parties before a legal audio recording can be made. An exception had to be specifically written into Maryland law in order to allow recordings from police dashboard cameras, and no such exemption has been made for body-mounted cameras, Mr. Rocah said.
    "We think they can be very useful," Mr. Rocah said. "Whether they are OK, is a little bit ambiguous."
    The notion of officers recording all interactions with civilians also has raised concern over privacy issues, such as when officers enter a person's home. Laurel, which with 64 officers is believed to be the largest police department in the region to use body-mounted cameras, is still reviewing guidelines for the use of the cameras.
    New Carrollton officers are required to inform anyone they stop that they are being recorded, Chief Rice said. The department hasn't had any problems arise from videotaping thus far. Chief Rice said he intends to phase out the department's dashboard cameras and replace them with the body-mounted cameras.
    New Carrollton spent about $600 per camera, while Laurel officials estimated their cameras cost about $2,000 apiece.
    The Cheverly Police Department purchased eight cameras last month, officials said.
    "Using such technologies could become a practice in large or small agencies, especially state police agencies who have lots of interaction with motorists," said Cynthia Lum, director of the Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy at George Mason University.
    But she pointed out that objections from unions or citizens, as well as the simple cost of outfitting large departments, might preclude the technology from being adopted more widely.
    "Larger agencies could have less resources to spend on this type of technology and may be more focused on core technologies such as improving information technologies and records management or upgrading radio or in-car computing technology," Ms. Lum said.
    Supervisors regularly review footage from officers' cameras, giving them an opportunity to see where officers could benefit from additional training as well, Chief Rice said.
    Additionally, the recording of officers' interactions headed off at least one police complaint.
    "We had one person make a claim and we explained to them that we would check the video on the officer's interaction. When they heard we had video, they changed their mind and they didn't want to complain," Chief Rice said.


    Annual Apology

    $
    0
    0
    Over the past few months I have forwarded some inappropriate pictures and jokes
    To friends who I thought shared my same sense of humor..
    Unfortunately this wasn't the case and I seem to have upset quite
    A few people who have accused me of being sexist and shallow..
    If you were one of these people, please accept my sincerest apologies.
    Looking to the rest of 2012 and onward, I will only post or send e-mails with cultural or educational content such as old monuments, nature and other interesting topics.
     Below is a picture of the Pont Neuf Bridge in Paris . It is the oldest bridge
     In Paris and took 26 years to build. It was completed in 1604..

    Babes of the Day - This is 18 and older. Rest assured I will offend you and rest assured I don't give a fuck! If you don't like crude hum or and think you will report me don't like my page. For those with the ability to laugh and take a joke welcome.

    FROM 4409: How to fight a DISORDERLY CONDUCT Charge

    $
    0
    0
    OFF THE WIRE

    FROM 4409: How to fight a DISORDERLY CONDUCT Charge

    This video was uploaded to YouTube.com/RP4409 on May 14, 2013. In keeping with the decentralization of Cop Block, it’s shared here to help the free flow of this information so we can all be safer. For other such content see: CopBlock.org/Resources

    From Video Description

    4409 on twitter: https://twitter.com/tweet4409
    4409 Store: https://wepay.com/stores/4409-store
    AZ: 13-2904 a 1 Disorderly conduct; classification
    TX: TITLE 9 CHAPTER 42 Sec. 42.01.
    CAL. PEN. CODE § 647 : California Code – Section 647
    New York Penal – Article 240 – § 240.20 Disorderly Conduct
    Title 2C The New Jersey Code of Criminal Justice – 2C:33-2 Disorderly conduct
    Julio case: http://www.avvo.com/legal-guides/ugc/…

    USA - Dept. of Homeland Security Forced to Release List of Keywords Used to Monitor Social Networking Sites

    $
    0
    0
    OFF THE WIRE
    WHAT THE FUCK..
     The complete DHS Analyst’s Desktop Binder is available here.


    English: Seal of the United States Department ...

    If you are thinking about tweeting about clouds, pork, exercise or even Mexico, think again. Doing so may result in a closer look by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
    In a story appearing earlier today on the U.K’s Daily Mail website, it was reported that the DHS has been forced to release a list of keywords and phrases it uses to monitor various social networking sites. The list provides a glimpse into what DHS describes as “signs of terrorist or other threats against the U.S.”
    The list was posted by the Electronic Privacy Information Center who filed a request under the Freedom of Information Act, before suing to obtain the release of the documents. The documents were part of the department’s 2011 ’Analyst’s Desktop Binder‘ used by workers at their National Operations Center which instructs workers to identify ‘media reports that reflect adversely on DHS and response activities’.
    The information sheds new light on how government analysts are instructed to patrol the internet searching for domestic and external threats. The Daily Mail’s article noted the Electronic Privacy Information Center wrote a letter to the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Counter-terrorism and Intelligence, describing it’s choice of words as ‘broad, vague and ambiguous’.
    What wasn’t disclosed is how the agency actually gains access to the various search engines and social networks to monitor the specified keywords. My guess is the DHS has a “special arrangement” with companies like GoogleGOOG+0.06%, FacebookFB-0.82%, MicrosoftMSFT-0.43%, Yahoo and Twitter to gain secure direct API access. This type of access would allow it to use distributed cloud technologies to monitor the daily flow of social media and search activity in something close to real time.
    I would love to learn more about the technologies used to accomplish this type of social / web monitoring. The applications for monitoring trends and social statics are fascinating when applied to other industry sectors. Given the extent of the monitoring, I’m sure this post itself is now coming up on the DHS radar, so please feel free to leave a comment with any insights.
      List1
    (Update 1: Reading through the Desktop Binder, I discovered the DHS Twitter account is @dhsnocmmc1 and DHS appears to be using tweetdeck to monitor the various keywords. See Page 38 – Also interesting to note they seem to be using a Mac Mini as a server, and no password vaults. All Passwords appear to be shared in a plain text word document.)
    (Update 2: On page 37, DHS instructs analysts to accept invalid SSL certificates forever without verification. Although invalid SSL warnings often appear in benign situations, they can also signal a man-in-the-middle attack. Not a good practice for the security conscience. Thanks to @obraon twitter for the tip.)

    Lane Splitting Guidelines

    $
    0
    0
    Lane Splitting Guidelines

    Lane splitting in a safe and prudent manner is not illegal in the
    state of California. The term lane splitting, sometimes known as lane
    sharing, filtering or white-lining, refers to the process of a
    motorcyclist riding between lanes of stopped or slower moving traffic
    or moving between lanes to the front of traffic stopped at a traffic
    light.

        Lane Splitting Guidelines - Quick Guide
        Lane Splitting General Guidelines - Expanded Version

    In all cases, the CHP urges extreme caution when splitting lanes.

    Lane Splitting - Getting home safely is everyone's responsibility.

    The CHP presents Thrill or Buzz Kill?, a motorcycle safety video reminding
    motorcyclists about the added responsibility and attention the road demands.

    California Motorcyclist Safety Program (CMSP) - The CHP is statutorily
    responsible for California's official motorcycle safety training
    program. Pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 2930-2935, the
    CHP administers the program through a primary contractor, currently
    the Motorcycle Safety Foundation. As of March 2012, over 800,000
    motorcycle riders have received training at one of the CMSP's 134
    training sites since the program began in July 1987.
    The program consists of a 15-hour classroom and on-cycle Basic
    RiderCourse (BRC). The BRC is mandatory for those under the age of 21
    but is also recommended to those 21 and older who are seeking to
    obtain a motorcycle endorsement on their California driver license.
    The CMSP also offers the Premier Program which is an extended BRC
    consisting of 7.5 hours of classroom and 13.5 hours of on-cycle time.
    While not part of the CMSP, the CHP and its partners encourage all
    riders to be life long learners. Riders can refresh or enhance skills
    at a Basic RiderCourse2. A website, www.ca-msp.org, serves as the
    training course referral service. Find out more about the California
    Motorcyclist Safety Program.
    [A beginning motorcycle rider receives instruction from an instructor]

    Data received from the California Office of Traffic Safety shows:
    Motorcycle fatalities in California increased 175% in ten years, from
    204 in 1998 to 560 in 2008. These increases in motorcyclist deaths
    occurred at a time when significant gains were achieved in other areas
    of traffic safety. Although we did experience reductions in motorcycle
    fatalities in 2009 and 2010, preliminary 2011 data indicates a
    possible increase and motorcyclists are over represented in overall
    numbers of traffic deaths.
    [Beginning motorcycle riders in a training class]       [A line of
    beginning motorcycle riders in a training class]
    A class of beginning motorcycle riders receive instruction.

    California Motorcycle-Involved Statistics - Between 1986 and 1999,
    California enjoyed a 13-year decline in motorcycle-involved fatal and
    severe injury collisions. However, starting in 1999, these numbers
    steadily increased over a 10-year period peaking in 2008. It is
    important to note, however, that according to 2009 and 2010 data,
    motorcycle-involved fatal and injury collisions are down
    significantly.

    Despite the strides in reducing motorcyclist fatality and injury
    collisions over the past couple of years, statistics on motorcyclists
    show a disproportionate rate of collisions compared to numbers of
    riders and to other traffic. A National Highway Traffic Safety
    Administration report shows that for the same per-mile exposure,
    motorcyclists are roughly 28 times more likely to die than occupants
    of other vehicles.

    Another conspicuous trend involves the number of motorcyclist
    fatalities and age. Several groups of riders are over represented,
    compared to their presence within the motorcycle riding population.
    For example, a small percentage of the motorcycle operators are riders
    aged 15-19 (4 percent) and 20-24 (6 percent), yet represent nearly
    twice that percentage of fatalities (11-13 percent). A second group of
    riders over represented according to their presence in the population
    is riders aged 25-54. It should also be noted that 90 percent of the
    fatal victims are male.

    The primary cause for 59 percent of the motorcycle collisions were
    attributed to three factors: unsafe speed, improper turning, and
    driving under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs.

    Lastly, 65 percent of the fatal and 56 percent of the injury
    motorcycle-involved collisions were the fault of the motorcyclist.

    View Sections 7H - 7L (Motorcycle Data) of the Statewide Integrated
    Traffic Records System

    Motorcycle Helmets - Repeated attempts to repeal California's
    motorcycle helmet law and substitute it with a lesser version
    requiring those under 18 to wear a United States Department of
    Transportation compliant helmet have failed in the state legislature.
    Statistical information continue to support the helmet law, but some
    adult riders have been advocating its repeal from the moment the law
    went into effect on January 1, 1992. Advocates of repeal contend it is
    a matter of individual choice whether to wear a helmet or not, and a
    personal right to decide whether to take the risk. The idea that
    motorcyclists over 21 should be exempt from the requirement for
    helmets completely ignores some other facts that prompted passage of
    the helmet law. In 1987, before the law was passed, 77 percent of
    motorcyclist fatalities involved victims over the age of 21, with 69
    percent of those injured over the age of 21.

    Motorcycle Safety Grants: The California Highway Patrol (CHP) will
    implement a 12-month traffic safety grant to reduce
    motorcycle-involved collisions on popular roadways and mountain range
    areas throughout California. To maximize enforcement efforts, each CHP
    Division will identify and concentrate on problematic locations on
    routes within their respective Areas, where motorcycle-involved
    collisions are the highest. Grant activities will include enhanced
    enforcement, a public awareness and educational campaign, and paid
    media campaign will be launched to show a "share the road" Public
    Service Announcement. The project ends September 30, 2012 . The grant
    will be disseminated throughout CHP field Divisions between October 1,
    2011, and September 30, 2012.

    Strategic Highway Safety Plan, Challenge Area 12, Improve Motorcycle
    Safety - The MSP Unit is responsible for co-leading and participating
    on this dedicated challenge area. A most recent accomplishment was the
    internal development and distribution of a 12-minute DVD, 700 Gs, It's
    a Killer, which provides education about proper and legal motorcycle
    safety helmets. The MSP Unit is in the process of developing
    additional action items in collaboration with its partners including
    the Department of Motor Vehicles, California Department of
    Transportation, and Office of Traffic Safety. Action items are
    expected to commence in October 2011 with a target date of completion
    for most items to be October 2013.
     

    From Bikernet 4/4/2013 Post

      CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL POSTS RULES FOR LEGAL LANE-SPLITTING-- This is ridiculous. Now we have Greg Covel, executive director of ABATE of California telling us "They are very reasonable" Who does he work for the CHP, he's suppose to be supporting us. Well there is another group not to belong to.


    --Joseph Guarino
    iamguarino@yahoo.com
    Tombstone, AZ


    From Bikernet 4/4/2013 Post

    Viewing all 6498 articles
    Browse latest View live