Quantcast
Channel: Bikers Of America, Know Your Rights!
Viewing all 6498 articles
Browse latest View live

Love Or Hate Devils Ride While You Can

$
0
0
OFF THE WIRE
agingrebel.com
Don’t count on The Devils Ride coming back for a third season. The program ranked 13th out of 15 cable shows in the 10 p.m. and 10:30 p.m. time slots last Monday night.
According to information gathered by the Nielsen Company, a firm that measures what people buy and watch, the fourth and most recent episode of the second season of The Devils Ride attracted an audience of about 1.2 million viewers. That represented about 0.7 percent of the viewers aged 18-49 watching anything during the time slot. The ratings may eventually be adjusted upward to reflect DVR views of the episode. The numbers do not reflect downloads of the episode on Netflix and similar services.
Two episodes of Pawn Stars on the History Channel won the time slot. The 10:30 p.m. episode of that program had 5.06 million viewers and a 1.5 percent share. The first episode of that show had about 20,000 fewer viewers. WWE Entertainment had 4.57 million viewers and 1.7 percent of the most coveted audience. The Devils Ride also had fewer viewers and a lower share than Teen Mom II on MTV, the first episode of Lizard Lick Towing on TruTV, Duck Dynasty on A&E, and Family Guy on TBS. The biker show had fewer viewers than House Hunters and House Hunters International on Home & Garden, both episodes of Diners, Drive Ins and Dives on the Food Network and the second episode of Lizard Lick Towing although it had a higher market share of young and middle aged viewers than the Food Network and Home & Garden shows. The only shows in its time slot that The Devils Ride beat in both viewers and share were Lost Girl on SyFy– a show about a succubus who feeds on the sexual energy of humans –and Vanderpump Rules– a spinoff of The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills– on Bravo.

Devils Who
The Devils Ride presents itself to unsuspecting viewers as an “inside look” at San Diego County motorcycle clubs. It might be more accurately described as either a parody of motorcycle clubs, a parody of FX Networks Sons of Anarchy or a self conscious parody of itself. It was apparently conceived as a reality show about a mundane and minor three-piece patch club called the Laffing Devils Motorcycle Club. That club was kicked out of the San Diego Confederation of Clubs last year for several reasons including coziness with local police. Under the rules of the Confederation, officers of expelled clubs are forbidden to join clubs in the COC.
The show has been beset by several outbreaks of bad press. In the first episode of the show, cast members actually assaulted a passing photographer on camera. Soon after that episode aired, Sons of Anarchy producer Kurt Sutter blasted the program and Discovery, the network on which it appears, for stealing his ideas. A twitter argument quickly erupted between Sutter and Devils Ride cast member Robert “Sandman” Johnston. Other clubs in San Diego disapproved of the show and the Laffing Devils MC quickly lost members. Last September, cast member Thomas “Gipsy” Quinn was accused of molesting a child and last December Johnston broke into his estranged wife’s home and stabbed a guest in the back.

Bischoff Hervey Entertainment
The Devils Ride is produced by Bischoff Hervey Entertainment, which was founded by Eric Bischoff, a showman with a background in professional wrestling, and former child star Jason Hervey. It was apparently their decision to paint the show into its current corner.
The program has been sold to viewers as television verite and during its brief ten episode (so far) run the producers have tried to back up the claim by trotting out several real life tough guys. Last season Rusty Coones, former President of the Orange County Hells Angels charter appeared in two episodes. This season introduced former Hells Angel Ralph “Rockem” Randolph and former convict Christopher Michael “White Boi” Boultinghouse as regular cast members.
This season the show’s plot has revolved around a ludicrous “biker war” between the Laffing Devils and another Bischoff Hervey creation called the Sinister Mob Syndicate Motorcycle Club. Monday’s episode included the return of first season cast member “Billy the Kid.” The ratings indicate that America was not begging to see more of him.

VIDEO`S
I Am the Darkness music video by Mike P The Big Homie



BREAKING NEWS - (Hollyweird) Discovery Channel Sets Return Date for Biker Club Reality Series 'Devils Ride'

$
0
0
OFF THE WIRE
The cable network has set a return date for the second season of the motorcycle club reality series, The Devils Ride, The Hollywood Reporter has learned exclusively.

Premiering Monday, Feb. 18 at 10 p.m., the new season of The Devils Ride will follow the San Diego biker war as it gets bigger and deeper. The Laffing Devils, which was once one of the fastest growing motorcycle clubs in the city has split into two separate clubs. Now they're going head-to-head with rival club, Sinister Mob (or Sin Mob, for short).

The Laffing Devils' leadership is in turmoil: founding member Danny Boy and Sandman are butting heads, Billy the Kid is MIA and White Boi -- recently released from prison -- is causing ripples among the club members. On the other side of the coin, Sin Mob seems stronger than ever.

The Devils Ride is produced by Bischoff Hervey Entertainment. Eric Bischoff, Jason Hervey and Steve Stockman are executive producers, with Discovery's David Pritikin.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/discovery-channels-devils-ride-season-413600

Babe`s of the DAY..... This is 18 and older. Rest assured I will offend you and rest assured I don't give a fuck! If you don't like crude hum or and think you will report me don't like my page. For those with the ability to laugh and take a joke welcome.

Boner Pics

Knife Laws in California: Is It Legal to Carry One ? By Jim March and also Sy Nazif, Esq.

$
0
0
OFF THE WIRE
 The information posted below is from a well-known article written by Jim March on 5/16/2002 titled, "California Knife Laws: A Comprehensive Guide," url:
http://www.ninehundred.com/~equalccw/knifelaw.html
Also Sy Nazif, Esq. article is from the Bailingwire, newsletter.
ML&R
Philip & Bill

FOR THOSE OF US HERE IN O`SIDE CA, it is written out below.
THE LAWS  VARIE  FROM CITY TO CITY, TOWN TO TOWN,
 COUNTY TO COUNTY ALSO....
 California Knife Laws, Since Oceanside PD follows the state statue here it is,
Oceanside City Code 20. 10
Sec. 20.10 – Weapons - Possession in Public - Prohibited
No person shall be or appear in any street, alley, sidewalk, parkway or any public place or place open to public view while carrying upon his person, or having in his immediate possession, any dangerous or deadly weapon. This section shall not be construed to duplicate prohibitions of California state statute, or to prohibit the possession of weapons expressly authorized by California state statute.

1. 
SECTION FIVE: DEALING WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT WHEN PACKIN' STEEL
First thing: don't get nervous. If you've read this, you're not going to be breaking any knife laws.  California's knife laws are actually pretty decent, better than most states (even the shall-issue gun permit ones).  If you're nervous, the cop will read that, and he won't know what to think - but the conversation WILL go downhill.
If you're walking past a cop with a legally concealed knife, DO NOT "pat the knife" to make sure the concealment is still effective.  That's the number one way cops spot people packing guns illegally.  They'll think that's what you're doing.  The resulting conversation won't be pleasant.
If there's any chance at all that the guy is gonna search you, politely declare that you're carrying a "pocketknife legal under state law".  Got that?  Tell him where it is on you, let him take control of it.  DO NOT SCARE THE DUDE WITH THE BADGE AND GUN.  Don't reach for nuthin' unless he tells you to do so.  At all times, act like this is just a normal business transaction.
So what if he/she thinks your piece(s) is/are illegal?
You explain that California knife law has changed a bunch of times starting in 1997 and twice more that you know of, so you're not terribly surprised there's confusion.  Calmly explain as much of the relevant Penal Codes as you can recall...if you're into big folders, PC653k and the bit in 12020 about "not readily available if concealed in the closed position" is a start.  If he ain't buying, calmly ask for a supervisor.
If he wants to confiscate your cutlery, ASK FOR A RECEIPT.  If he says anything about "that'll mean you'll get a ticket too, and/or an arrest", stand your ground and calmly ask for a receipt.  He's bluffing because he wants your knife.  Sorry if any cops reading this are offended, but it happens - I've met enough people it's happened to to be a believer, although it hasn't happened to me.  If he just plain takes it without a receipt, get his badge number and/or car number (if the latter is all you can get, record the TIME).  If it was a city or county cop, make a THEFT complaint in detail with your nearest California Highway Patrol station (they investigate local wrongdoing).  If it was CHP, hmmm...complain to the CHP supervisors maybe, or the Sheriff, but for God's sake don't let 'em off clean.
IF YOU HAD TO THREATEN AN ASSAILANT WITH A DRAWN BLADE:
You have two choices: get the hell out of there ASAP and travel far and fast, because odds are, crooks that get chased off by an armed citizen love to file a "he threatened me" complaint and bust YOU.  Bug out.  NOTE: we're talking about a situation in which you haven't committed a crime, and since no actual violence occurred neither did anybody else.  So "fleeing the scene" rules don't really apply.  And you also don't want the SOB coming back with reinforcements and/or heavy artillery.  Time to go!
If that's not possible, because the crook knows where you are or who you are (or have your car's license plate number), jump on 911 and report an attempted crime, pronto.  There are too many lazy cops that just believe the first complaint.  Make yours first.  You'll probably have one major advantage: the crook will have a violent record and you won't.
IF YOU HAD TO ACTUALLY DRAW BLOOD IN DEFENSE:
When the cops show up, there are only three things you should say: I was in fear of my life, I'm too shaken up to talk, I want a lawyer.  (If there are witnesses you know of, point them out to the cops and tell the cops to talk to them.)
Bernie Goetz didn't do that.  He was furious at the four attempted muggers, he made that anger plain in a long discussion down at the station, and he ended up getting charged with murder and attempted murder when it was absolutely clear-cut self defense.
When a cop gets involved in a shooting, they understand that immediately afterwards, he's too shaken to explain clearly what happened.  So most departments give him 24 hours to settle down before talking to him.  But if you're involved in lethal force, some will take advantage of your rattled state to pry garbled statements out of you.  You HAVE the right to remain silent.  Use it.
I'm assuming here that if you drew or used steel, you had a damned good reason.  That's a subject for a much more detailed (not to mention PROFESSIONAL) treatment - see Introduction for some reference works.

Oceanside City Code 20. 10
Sec. 20.10 – Weapons - Possession in Public - Prohibited
No person shall be or appear in any street, alley, sidewalk, parkway or any public place or place open to public view while carrying upon his person, or having in his immediate possession, any dangerous or deadly weapon. This section shall not be construed to duplicate prohibitions of California state statute, or to prohibit the possession of weapons expressly authorized by California state statute.

 Knife Laws in California:  Is It Legal Carry One?

Written by Sy Nazif, Esq Taken from the BAILING WIRE,

 was given to me by John, From ABATE,  of CA 



For my first Bailing Wiring Column, I was asked to write about knife laws in California.  After researching the law, I certainly understood why some confusion exists as to what is legal to carry and what isn’t: there are over a dozen statutes on the subject, as well as numerous municipal codes, and inconsistent court decisions that further muddy the water.  This article is intended to shed some light on the rules and inconsistencies in California knife laws.


Of course, I wouldn't be a very good attorney without giving a few caveats before I begin.  First, remember that carrying any weapon, even one that’s legal, can cause you a lot of grief with law enforcement.  Cops routinely write tickets and make arrests for things they incorrectly think is illegal.  Being found “not guilty” will not make up for the time and aggravation of getting arrested and missing work -- not to mention the cost of hiring an attorney.  Also, this article only covers California law.  State laws can vary greatly, and taking a knife that is legal in California over state lines may get you into trouble with federal laws or laws of other states.  Local ordinances may also impact the legality of your knife.

With those warnings out of the way, California laws covering switchblades, daggers, and disguised blades are discussed below.  For those of you with a short attention span, here is the summary: 

In California, the following are illegal:  (1) Any knife with a blade of 2" or longer, that can be opened with a button or the flick of your wrist; (2) concealed possession of any "dirk" or "dagger," i.e., any stabbing device with a fixed blade, regardless of blade length; (3) possession or sale of any disguised blades, i.e., cane swords, writing pen knives, lipstick knives, etc., or any knife that is undetectable to metal detectors; (4) possession of a knife with a blade longer than 2 1/2" on any school grounds; (5) possession of a fixed-blade knife with a blade longer than 2 1/2" on any college or university grounds; and (6) flashing or waiving any knife or weapon in a threatening manner.  Also, certain municipalities have their own laws that may affect the legality of carrying a knife.  In Los Angeles, for example, it's illegal to openly carry any knife with a blade longer than 3". 

Each of the above issues is discusses in greater detail below.

Switchblades  - Penal Code § 653k


Switchblades and other spring-loaded knives are generally illegal in California. Included in the legal definition of switchblade is "[any] knife having the appearance of a pocketknife and includes a spring-blade knife, snap-blade knife, gravity knife or any other similar type knife, the blade or blades of which are two or more inches in length and which can be released automatically by a flick of a button, pressure on the handle, flip of the wrist or other mechanical device, or is released by the weight of the blade or by any type of mechanism whatsoever."  The statute expressly excludes pocket knives that can be opened with one hand by pushing the blade open with one's thumb, as long as

the knife "has a detent or other mechanism that provides resistance that must be overcome in opening the blade, or that biases the blade back toward its closed position."

The statute further states that it is unlawful to : (1) to possess a switchblade in a vehicle, (2) to carry a switchblade anywhere upon one's person, or (3) to transfer or attempt to sell a switchblade to another person. In the 2009 case of People v. S.C., the Court of Appeals held that possession of a switchblade in a person's pocket, boot, etc., is unlawful, even if even if in one's own home.  In other words, it’s illegal to have a switchblade with a 2" or longer blade – period.

It should also be noted that a pocketknife that was legal when manufactured, but is broken or modified so that it will open freely, is a switchblade within the meaning of the statute. For example, in the 2008 case of People v. Angel R., the Court of Appeals examined a conviction over a pocketknife that, as originally manufactured, had a hole in the back of the blade that prevented it from flicking open. The trial court found, however, that the knife had been modified or damaged, and the resistance mechanism did not function so that the knife would open with a flick of the wrist.  Despite the original design of the knife, the Court of Appeals upheld the conviction.

Concealed Knives, Dirks, and Daggers - Penal Code § 12020

In California, it is illegal for any person to carry concealed, certain knives, legally described as "dirks" and "daggers," i.e., any fixed-blade knife or stabbing weapon.  Pursuant to the statute, it is illegal to carry concealed upon one's person any fixed-blade knife.  This does not include a legal (non-switchblade) pocketknife, as long as that knife is closed.  Carrying a knife in an openly-worn sheath is not concealment within the meaning of the statute.  As discussed below, however, this law may be impacted by local ordinances.

Cane Swords and other Disguised Blades - Penal Code § 20200 et seq


Any knife or blade that is disguised so as to not look like a weapon is also illegal in California.  This includes, cane swords, belt-buckle knives, lipstick case knives, air gauge knives, writing pen knives, etc.  Blades that are undetectable to metal detectors (e.g., ceramic blades) are also illegal.

Possession of Knives on School Grounds - Penal Code § 626.10


It is illegal for any person to bring or possess "any dirk, dagger, ice pick, knife having a blade longer than 2 1/2 inches, folding knife with a blade that locks into place, [or] razor with an unguarded blade . . . upon the grounds of, or within, any public or private school providing instruction in kindergarten or any of grades 1 to 12 . . ."  The law with regard to college campuses is similar, but less restrictive.  Subsection (b) of the statute provides that it is illegal for any person to bring or possess "any dirk, dagger, ice pick, or knife having a fixed blade longer than 2 1/2 inches upon the grounds of, or within, any [college or university]."

Brandishing Knives - Penal Code § 417


In California, it is illegal to brandish any deadly weapon, including knives.  The law states that it is unlawful for any person to "draw or exhibit any deadly weapon . . . in a rude, angry, or threatening manner, or . . . to unlawfully use a deadly weapon."  This does not include use of such a weapon in self defense.

Local Ordinances - Here's Where the Law Gets Messy


If the laws above seem confusing, as the saying goes, "you ain't seen nothin' yet."  Local ordinances vary from city to city, and county to county.  Worse, California courts have been inconsistent in ruling on the enforceability of these local laws.

For example, in the City of Los Angeles, it is illegal to publicly carry, in plain view, any knife, dirk or dagger having a blade 3" or more in length, any ice pick or similar sharp tool, any straight-edge razor or any razor blade fitted to a handle.  (There are certain exceptions, such as where the knife is for use in a "lawful occupation, for lawful recreational purposes, or as a recognized religious practice.") The County of Los Angeles has a similar rule, which makes it illegal to openly carry, in public, "any knife having a blade of three inches or more in length; any spring-blade, switch-blade or snap-blade knife; any knife any blade of which is automatically released by a spring mechanism or other mechanical device; any ice pick or similar sharp stabbing tool; any straight-edge razor or any razor blade fitted to a handle."  In other words, it is illegal in Los AngelesCounty to openly carry any knife with a blade of 3" or longer. 

It gets worse.  Los Angeles Code section 55.01 also makes it illegal to carry any weapon concealed on one's person.  As such, in Los Angeles, you can't openly carry a blade over 3", but you can't carry such a weapon concealed, either.

Interestingly, the Courts have held that the Los Angeles law forbidding carrying a concealed weapon is invalid.  In the 1968 case of People v. Bass, a man was arrested and charged with carrying a concealed folding knife.  The Court of Appeals overturned the conviction, holding that the Los Angeles law conflicted with the state law, and was therefore invalid.  Nonetheless, the Los Angeles law is still on the books.

What is even more interesting is that other, more recent cases completely contradict the decision in People v. Bass.  In the 1985 case of People v. Gerardoi, the defendant was charged with violating a local law of the City of Commerce that is nearly identical to the Los Angeles local law prohibiting carrying blades over 3".  On appeal, the defendant cited the Bass case, arguing that the city code was invalid.  The Gerardoi court rejected the holding of Bass, and found that the city code was valid.

Where does all this information leave us?  The short answer is, in a mess.  There are certainly things that are illegal: any switchblade with a blade 2" or longer, or concealed possession of any knife with a fixed blade.  Other knives may or may not be legal,

depending on how and where you carry them, and where you are in California.  The best this to do is to check local ordinances before deciding to carry a knife or any other weapon in California.  Better yet, think twice before carrying a knife.  As you know, some cops look for any excuse to hassle bikers.

Ride safe, and stay legal.  If either of these fail, call me!

ABOUT SY NAZIF, ESQ.
Sy Nazif is a life-long motorcyclist and an attorney who specializes in biker’s rights and representing motorcycle accident victims in California.  He is a graduate of the esteemed University of California Hastings College of Law in San Francisco, and has worked with AIM, NCOM, and the COC.  He later founded RiderzLaw.com and began his own firm, which is quickly becoming one of the leading motorcycle rights and injury firms in the state.

1-888-5-RIDERZ
This article is written for informational purposes only and is not to be construed as legal advice.

Sec. 20.10 – Weapons - Possession in Public - Prohibited

No person shall be or appear in any street, alley, sidewalk, parkway or any public place or place open to public view while carrying upon his person, or having in his immediate possession, any dangerous or deadly weapon. This section shall not be construed to duplicate prohibitions of California state statute, or to prohibit the possession of weapons expressly authorized by California state statute.

Oceanside California Knife Laws. As always I am not a lawyer and these videos are strictly for informational Purposes only if you need legal Advice Seek out A Criminal Lawyer. As always read and keep a copy of all pertaining knife laws for yourself, practice stating them so you sound confident and intelligent, you're your best advocate. Stopping the process at the initial contact is better than wining a court case after lots of legal action.

No Length Law for Folding Knives in California
 http://youtu.be/pKlXR1x9xFU

True in general, but some areas like gov buildings, airports have them but if you're smart you won't be carrying any knives into those places toavoid the hassel. For the rest of the state just remember to check out your local ordinaces and Municipal Codes they might have length laws you might need to comply with. This is just merely information to keep yourself a Legal Knife carrying Citizen of California. This video has the Laws you should know and some definitions for terms for with in the laws. Remember these videos are for strictly informational purposes only if you need legal advice seek a Criminal Lawyer.

Over View of California Knife Laws
http://youtu.be/IA54WFX5eww

An Overview of Knife Laws in California, see other videos in series for more detailed information on each law. Do watch parts 1 - 7 because they pertain to all of California, your City / County laws "add" to not "take away" from the overall California laws. Reviewing PC 12020 & PC 653k are "a must" in my opinion because they define what's legal EDC (Every Day Carry). Link, pass on or just show friends these videos, the more people know the less "bad law enforcement" can mess with legal knife carrying citizens. Remember when you travel to other parts of the state those laws pertain to you, so you must know the laws of the area you are "staying in" if you are just passing through an area it's something you can fight in court, the "pass through law" you can't expect to know and follow every municipal code in areas you are passing through. but you should and must abide by the laws in the areas you are staying in. As always I am not a lawyer and these videos are strictly for informational Purposes only if you need legal Advice Seek out A Criminal Lawyer. As always read and keep a copy of all pertaining knife laws for yourself, practice stating them so you sound confident and intelligent, you're your best advocate. Stopping the process at the initial contact is better than wining a court case after lots of legal action.

THANK YOU AGAIN , TO CHECK OUT MORE GO TO JM`S
article written by Jim March on 5/16/2002 titled,
"California Knife Laws: A Comprehensive Guide," url:
http://www.ninehundred.com/~equalccw/knifelaw.html

California, Undercover Officer Provides Inside Look Into Local Gang

$
0
0
OFF THE WIRE
Source: 10news.com
SANTEE, Calif. -- Authorities say a Santee-based gang, whose members include convicted felons with long rap sheets, is recruiting kids as young as 14.
Members said the group known as the "Peckerwoods" is nothing more than a motorcycle club.
An undercover police officer, who has been tracking the Peckerwoods since 2005, told 10News the group's ideology is illustrated in its members' clothing.
Jackets taken from arrested Peckerwood members showcase Nazi symbols, including the iron cross and SS bolts.
Additionally, the name Peckerwood has a deeper meaning -- it is what America's slaves called their masters.
Police said, in Santee, members wear the name as a badge of honor.
"Sometimes their beliefs -- from what we can tell -- their symbols and colors, they teach at home," the undercover officer said.
Santee resident Lyle Snow has two African-American children and was attacked by 15-year-old Trevor Solis last year. According to court records, Solis' father, Trenton, is a known Peckerwood who served prison time for crippling an African-American Marine in 1998.
"I have had a lot of cases that have involved juveniles that have looked me straight in the face and said, 'I was born a racist; I was raised a racist and you can't change that,'" the undercover officer said. "Coming out of a 14-year-old's mouth is just real surprising."
Police said the Peckerwoods recruit new members by using things such as T-shirts that say "Support your local Peckerwoods."
In 2007, police said weapons and drugs were found in a raid at the Peckerwoods' Santee clubhouse.
"I have to say, and I'm not just saying this to cover my tail, they've treated me with respect," said Santee Mayor Randy Voepel. "They are an organization that, like anyone, has a few bad apples."
10News asked Peckerwood president Ronald Luetticke for an interview, and he said in a voice message: "My attorney advised me that I probably shouldn't do it, and the other consideration I got is I have two young kids. I got two kids; I don't want to put them in any harms way."
Luetticke works professionally as a contractor and is licensed by the state of California.
The Department of Justice won't allow police to disclose how many Peckerwood members there are in San Diego County. Police did say a large majority of the members have criminal convictions.
Peckerwood board secretary Deron Jaffe came to the 10News studios unannounced Tuesday and left the following statement:
"Peckerwood Motorcycle Club was established 23 years ago with the intent of providing a brotherhood for riders of Harley-Davidson motorcycles. Our club members are not racist and we do not recruit children or anyone else to become members of our club. We cannot control people outside of our club who might be racist and call themselves "Peckerwoods." We are nothing more than a motorcycle club and are not affiliated with any other groups of individuals who refer to themselves or others as "Peckerwoods." Our members are working class people with families. We don't advocate or engage in violence towards others. The Peckerwood Motorcycle club is proud of its involvement in charitable causes such as the Amber Dubois Memorial Fund and annual toy drive to benefit the orphanage in Rosarito Beach Mexico."

Peckerwoods M.C.

9th ANNUAL ROSARITO BEACH RUN

CA - Protect Your Right to a Trial for Traffic Tickets

$
0
0
OFF THE WIRE

Stop AB666

Protect Your Right to a Trial for Traffic Tickets
What does AB666 Do?

  • Eliminates Your Right to a Trial if You Get a Red Light Camera Ticket
  • Makes You Responsible for the Ticket Even When Someone Else Is Driving
  • Sets up Kangaroo “Administrative Hearing” Courts Run By Those Who Gave You the Ticket
  • No Evidence Other than the Ticket Itself is Needed to Convict You
  • No Right to Face Your Accuser
  • You Are Assumed Guilty and Have to Prove Your Innocence
  • You Will Have to Pay a Fee If You Want Your Case Heard in Court
  • Expands the Use of Photo Enforcement to Other Traffic Violations
Call California Assembly Member Bob Wieckowski and tell him Stop Selling Us Out to the Red Light Camera Companies
DAY OF PROTEST
Tomorrow March 21st
Call (916) 319-2025
Ask for Ashley Medina, his Legislative Aid or just leave a message.
If the line is busy, keep calling till you get through
Sign the petition to stop AB 666 and get more info here


DEAD IN 5 HEARTBEATS THEATRICAL RELEASE

$
0
0
DEAD IN 5 HEARTBEATS THEATRICAL RELEASESponsored by Speed and Strength

PHOENIXApril 5th, 6th & 7th
Silver Cinemas/Super Saver 8, 2710 W Bell Rd, Phoenix, AZ 85053
1pm 3:15pm 5:30pm 7:45pm 10pm (Fri, Sat, Sun only)
TICKETS ON SALE NOW at location for $10.


SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAVenue is changing location. Stay Posted.

SACRAMENTOMay 25th
Crest Theatre, 1013 K St., Sacramento, CA 95814
3:30pm & 7pm (Sat only)
$10 TICKETS ON SALE NOW here at Tickets.com


KANSAS CITYJune 1st
Screenland Armour Theatre, 408 Armour Rd, North Kansas City, MO 64116
2pm 5pm 8pm (Sat only)
$10 TICKETS ON SALE NOW here at DeadIn5Heartbeats.com


MINNEAPOLISJune 8th
Pepitos Parkway Theater, 4814 Chicago Ave South, Minneapolis MN 55417
1pm, 4pm, 7pm (Sat only)
$10 TICKETS ON SALE NOW at BrownPaperTickets.com


CHICAGOJune 21st
Portage Theatre, 4050 N Milwaukee Ave, Chicago IL
8pm (Friday only)
$12.50 TICKETS ON SALE NOW at DeadIn5Heartbeats.com


CLEVELANDJune 29th
The Agora Theatre, 5000 Euclid Ave, Cleveland OH
3:00pm, 6:00pm, & 9:00pm (Sat only)
$10 TICKETS - Sales TBA


NEW YORKAugust 23-25th
Bellmore Movies, 222A Pettit Ave, Bellmore NY 11710
(Friday 9:30pm) (Saturday 5pm, 9:30pm) (Sunday 12 noon)
$15 TICKETS ON SALE NOW at DeadIn5Heartbeats.com


DENVERAug. 31st & Sept. 1st
The Oriental Theatre, 4335 West 44th Ave., Denver CO 80212
2pm, 4:30pm, 7:00pm, 9:30pm (Sat & Sun Only)
$10 TICKETS ON SALE NOW here at www.TheOrientalTheater.com


(More cities/dates will be announced in upcoming weeks)
Dead In 5 Heartbeats
Sponsored By
 photo 1bdb93e2-0cbc-4fd6-80a6-b245bd7a18f6_zps30eba5b3.jpg

ROSARITO BEACH WET T-SHIRT CONTEST - 8/4/2012 PART 3

Rusty Coones and Rodrigo Requejo Are Hell Raisers

$
0
0
OFF THE WIRE

For the Illusion Motorsports bike builders, life has been one wild ride

CALIFORNIA: SB-435 - Clearing Up The Misconceptions

$
0
0
OFF THE WIRE
This is the future – WE WILL BE HUNTED AND HARESSED. All the BEACH CITIES in Ca do this already – so when funds are low – and they’re looking for ways to raise them – and the general public don’t care – we’re a TARGET. I see it as 2 sided – there’s dipshits that crank their pipes at 3am – get up to go to work and let the bike idle for 10 minutes with straight pipes. You know what? I don’t like that shit either – I barely sleep as it is. I coast my Thunderheader to the main street before 8am – I coast in late at night – some people are Fucking Stupid – and we’re all going to pay the PRICE........

ML&R
Screwdriver

After they originally put out somewhat incorrect information, I provided this to the MRF last month, and they are supposed to be running it in the current MRF Reports. Feel free to distribute as you see fit.
~Tony~

ABATE, of California
SB-435 - Clearing Up The Misconceptions
January 7, 2011
Due to the many false reports and misconceptions about SB-435, it looks like it is time to clear the misunderstandings and false impressions people have concerning SB-435 and ABATE of California’s role in shaping this bill. Contrary to all of the rumors, ABATE of California did not roll over on SB-435 and in fact, was the only major SMRO to oppose SB-435 until June 28, 2010 when it was heard in the Assembly Transportation Committee. At the hearing, last minute resistance was offered by other groups who showed up to testify in opposition, and a few other groups and individuals continued to oppose the bill as it made its way back to the Senate and Governor’s desk, where it was eventually signed.

So let’s look at what happened with SB-435, and how things really transpired. SB-435 was first introduced on February 26, 2009, by State Senator Fran Pavley, (D), Agoura Hills as a bill to institute biennial smog checks for motorcycles. After vigorous opposition to SB-435 by Jim Lombardo, ABATE of California’s lobbyist, SB-435 was turned into a two-year bill and allowed to pass out of the Senate with the provision that Senator Pavley amend the bill and remove the smog check language. In Senator Pavley’s own words, “ABATE’s lobbyist killed my smog bill on the Senate floor.” Accordingly, the record reflects several amendments, which were offered by the bill author before she amended it from a smog check bill into an EPA noise label match-up bill.

The bottom line here is that California’s motorcyclists will not be burdened with a unwarranted and restrictive smog check bill, thanks to the determined efforts of ABATE of California. Once again – NO SMOG CHECKS for motorcycles in California thanks to ABATE of California and Jim Lombardo. Moreover, in the final version of the bill, which was signed into law, all motorcycles currently on the road up to model year 2013 are grand-fathered in. That is a huge concession that ABATE of California was able to achieve on behalf of the over 800,000-registered motorcycle owners in the state. Just guessing, I would estimate that this will save the average owner with after market pipes at least $600 to $1,000.
On June 28, 2010, the version of SB-435 that passed out of the Assembly Transportation Committee is the one which basically was signed into law by the Governor. With just a few weeks prior notice, ABATE of California was able to mobilize to meet the threat posed by the amended bill. The amended SB-435 called for imposition of the 1983 EPA noise label match-up language that has been in effect at the Federal level for 27 years. In addition, it called for a $300 fine, a moving violation, a point on a driving record, and it would have allowed any law enforcement officer, including meter maids to cite motorcyclists, even if the motorcycle was parked. One of the amendments ABATE of California was apprehensive would be offered was the imposition of SAE J2825, developed by the AMA & MIC.

Incidentally, both the AMA and MIC were lobbying to get SAE J2825 introduced into SB-435, and that is a bullet that California’s motorcyclists were able to dodge. In a test performed by ABATE personnel certified in the J2825 testing procedure, virtually every after market set of pipes failed the test, which leads those of us in ABATE of California to have little faith in J2825’s objective standards. Moreover, J2825 would have led to roadside testing and every county and city with officers equipped with db meters would be pulling over and citing motorcyclists given the sorry state of the budget in California. ABATE of California urges all SMRO’s to take a hard look at J2825 before signing onto that program. ONE MORE TIME -- SAE J 2825 will lead to increased roadside checks! Is that really what we need or want?

While we dodged a bullet with J2825, SB-435 as amended contained plenty of anti-motorcycling language and as written, the bill would have affected all motorcycles from model year 2000 forward. Through the efforts of ABATE of California through our lobbyist, Jim Lombardo, several concessions were achieved that removed the most unfriendly and anti-motorcycle language from the bill. Through the joint efforts of ABATE’s Jim Lombardo and John Paliwoda of the California Motorcycle Dealer’s Association, the effective date of imposition of SB-435 was rolled back to 2013, and all motorcycles currently on the road are grand-fathered in. Additionally, due to ABATE’s efforts, violations were changed from a moving violation to a fix-it-ticket, it was dropped to a $50 fine from $300, and it is a secondary violation, meaning that it can’t be the primary reason for an enforcement stop.

As can be plainly seen, the final version of SB-435 was substantially altered by ABATE of California and while we would like to have seen the bill die in committee, we did not enjoy the same support against an anti-noise bill that we did against a smog check bill. Furthermore, the co-author of SB-435 was the Chairwoman of Assembly Transportation Committee, and we knew going into the bill hearing that we simply did not have the votes to kill this bill. While there were some in the ranks of the organization that wished to pursue a hard line stance, the vote from our Political Action Committee determined that we would pursue the course of seeking to modify the bill and in this we were successful given the concessions that were achieved. Had we followed a hard line approach and simply hoped we would defeat SB-435 in committee, we would today be facing a far different reality today than we are.

While there is much Monday morning quarterbacking going on regarding SB-435, ABATE of California is confident that we achieved the best possible outcome for the California motorcycling community that was possible given the difficult circumstances we faced. Two last items on the topic of SB-435 are that this bill is likely to have the unintended consequence of driving up the fair market price for pre-2013 used motorcycles due to the fact that they are grand-fathered in. Another consequence that other states facing similar legislation should be aware of is the 2013 date, which was extended to allow the manufacturers to comply. While we still have two years before SB-435 goes into effect, other states facing similar legislation will not have the same grace period if this legislation should come up in their respective states after January 2013.

Anthony Jaime
Executive Director
ABATE of California

Red Snapper Day xxx

$
0
0
Description:                          Description:                          cid:part10.07000103.05060709@safeathome.usDescription:                          Description:                          cid:part11.04070406.06070500@safeathome.usDescription:                          Description:                          cid:part12.04000801.07040504@safeathome.usDescription:                          Description:                          cid:part13.09030501.03040402@safeathome.usDescription:                          Description:                          cid:part14.00090400.05050403@safeathome.usDescription:                          Description:                          cid:part15.06000406.02030206@safeathome.usDescription:                          Description:                          cid:part16.00010103.06060900@safeathome.usDescription:                          Description:                          cid:part17.02070605.02060708@safeathome.usDescription:                          Description:                          cid:part18.03000309.05090505@safeathome.usDescription:                          Description:                          cid:part19.09090607.08060208@safeathome.usDescription:                          Description:                          cid:part20.04090508.02090106@safeathome.usDescription:                          Description:                          cid:part21.05030300.02080702@safeathome.usDescription:                          Description:                          cid:part22.06020407.02030503@safeathome.usDescription:                          Description:                          cid:part23.07020308.03030603@safeathome.usDescription:                          Description:                          cid:part24.02050306.04080207@safeathome.usDescription:                          Description:                          cid:part25.04080508.03050603@safeathome.usDescription:                          Description:                          cid:part26.03030206.08030100@safeathome.us
Happy Snapper Day, Buddy!
Ashes to ashes Dust to dust
If Rock Hudson ate pussy
He'd still be with us.....
 Description:                          Description:                          cid:part27.03080303.06040202@safeathome.usDescription:                          Description:                          cid:part28.00020408.08060805@safeathome.usDescription:                          Description:                          cid:part29.06040604.02070108@safeathome.usDescription:                          Description:                          cid:part30.02060106.07010904@safeathome.usDescription:                          Description:                          cid:part31.09010508.08080701@safeathome.us

CALIFORNIA - The new law, which goes into effect January 1st, 2013, prohibits MOTORCYCLE-ONLY CHECKPOINTS

$
0
0
OFF THE WIRE

http://cencalbiker.com/Abate-update-1201.html
ABATE Update (1202)

On July 13th, California Governor Jerry Brown signed Assembly Bill 1047 into law. The bill had passed the Assembly on a vote of 55 – 5, and sailed through the Senate on a 36 – 0 vote.

The new law, which goes into effect January 1st, 2013, prohibits MOTORCYCLE-ONLY CHECKPOINTS. This is great news for bikers! This victory came thanks to the many bikers who had voiced their outrage over the discriminatory practice. ABATE of California and the American Motorcycle Association (AMA) applauded both Assemblyman Kevin Jefferies, who introduced the bill and Gov. Brown for his signature.

The passage of the law comes as another ABATE-sponsored bill makes its way through the legislature. AB 1890 would allow motorcyclists to store transponders used on toll roads or bridges on their person or anywhere on or in the motorcycle. Current law requires transponders to be mounted on the motorcycle, where it can be stolen or fall off. Another bill which would allow “MOTORCYCLES OK” to be painted on HOV (high-occupancy vehicles) lanes, commonly known as commuter lanes, has been sidelined due to costs and the current state budget crisis. But according to ABATE State Director Greg Covel, there may be a way around that issue. “This is a constant battle, and requires effort from everyone,” Covel said, “We must also always keep our ears to the ground for legislation to remove our ability to lane share.”
Also, ABATE recently had a booth at the Spokes ’N’ Rods event in Fresno. Hosted by Fresno’s Local 24, the booth was also manned by Jim Lombardo, Assistant Legislative Director for ABATE of California. “Besides supporting a great cause, we signed up at least five new members and had many renewals. I really enjoyed my day!” said Lombardo.

CA - California Highway Patrol posts rules for legal lane-splitting by motorcyclists

$
0
0
OFF THE WIRE

 
 
 
FYI....
 
Right after the CHP put the Guidelines up on their Website I did sent a thank you to the CHP and the steering committee of the SHSP.
 
The guidleines went up on the OTS website 2 days ago and I sent out another thank you email....
 
These emails went out as the Safety Officer and Board Member for ABATE of CA.... Probably should have cc't the board on these too... But I sent it out from my other email address because I already had the emails for the state people listed there.

---
 



 
The CHP Guidelines and a "Thank You" to the CHP for the "official policy statement" should probably be continuously posted on our ABATE web site so all riders and drivers, both in & out of state can have access to the info 27-7! Dave H.  
 
In a message dated 2/7/2013 4:50:56 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, carol@abate.org writes:
Hi,

Publicity for ABATE

I thought you'd like this:
Read this story

Sacbee - California Highway Patrol posts rules for legal lane-splitting by motorcyclists
Lane-splitting. It's a slick maneuver motorcyclists love, allowing them to cut between slower moving cars and shoot out ahead. Car drivers, often startled, hate it – calling it brazen and dangerous.  
 http://www.sacbee.com/2013/02/07/5171619/california-highway-patrol-posts.html
California Highway Patrol posts rules for legal lane-splitting by motorcyclists

By Tony Bizjak The Sacramento Bee

Lane-splitting. It's a slick maneuver motorcyclists love, allowing them to cut between slower moving cars and shoot out ahead. Car drivers, often startled, hate it – calling it brazen and dangerous. Is it safe? Is it legal? Hoping to clarify the controversial practice, California officials have taken the unusual step of issuing a set of guidelines that affirm the move's legality but point out that there are only certain instances where it is considered safe. California is the only state in the country that allows lane-splitting, also known as "white-lining," where motorcyclists pass vehicles in adjacent lanes by driving between them. California Highway Patrol officials said they've posted the first-ever written guidelines on their website as part of a broader state highway safety initiative. It comes as the number of motorcyclists in California is on the rise, as well as the number of motorcycle crashes. "There is a need to acknowledge lane-splitting is being done in California, and a need to help people understand what is reasonable," said California Highway Patrol Sgt. Mark Pope. "Until now, no one in authority has said how to do it safely." The guidelines say motorcyclists can ride between two cars if there is room, but must do it at no more than 10 miles per hour faster than the vehicles they are passing. The guidelines also make it clear that motorcyclists should not attempt the maneuver at full freeway speeds, or in any traffic going 30 mph or faster. That essentially means the highest speed a motorcyclist should be going when lane-splitting is 39 mph. CHP officials say lane-splitting is more risky at higher speeds because motorcyclists have less time to react when something unexpected happens. "We are trying to get people to slow down," the CHP's Pope said. "A lot are traveling at 40 mph or faster. The faster you go, the harder it is to stop." Pope said the guidelines do not reflect new policy. The CHP has long held that lane-splitting is legal in California because nothing in the state Vehicle Code specifically prohibits it. Many states have explicit prohibitions against lane-splitting. Nevada state law, for instance, reads, "a person … shall not drive a motorcycle … between moving or stationary vehicles occupying adjacent traffic lanes." Oregon, Washington and Arizona have similar language in their highway codes. Other states simply consider the maneuver unauthorized, according to the American Motorcyclist Association's national cycling rules database. The practice is common in California. Some 87 percent of California motorcycle riders reported they lane-split, according to a recent state Office of Traffic Safety survey. Some motorcyclists call it lane sharing. It remains a misunderstood and polarizing practice. The traffic safety survey found that only 53 percent of California drivers knew lane-splitting is legal, and 7 percent of drivers admit they have attempted to block a lane-splitting motorcyclist from passing them. Several motorcycle activists lauded the guidelines for affirming California's unique lane-splitting privilege. "They are very reasonable," said Greg Covel, executive director of ABATE of California, a motorcycle rights organization. Now, "we know what the guidelines are, how close we are to staying within the law or pushing the law," Covel said. "If we get stopped for unsafe speed or lane changes, we know what we are getting into." CHP officials say they sometimes ticket motorcyclists who are lane-splitting, but citations are based on an officer's determination that the rider is going too fast for conditions, or that the rider's lane changes are unsafe. CHP officials acknowledge that motorcyclists get away with unsafe lane-splitting at times because it's hard to stop them. "A lot of us are in patrol cars. It is hard for us to catch them," Sacramento-area Sgt. Mike Bradley told The Bee in an interview for a previous story on the issue. CHP numbers show that more than 9,600 people in California were injured in motorcycle crashes in 2010, the most recent year measured, up 25 percent since 2000. But state officials say they know of no comprehensive studies focused on lane-splitting dangers, and they do not have data on the number of lane-splitting-related crashes. Police say they do get reports of side rear-view mirrors being ripped off and occasional crashes, including fatalities. Pope, of the CHP, and Chris Murphy, head of the state Office of Traffic Safety, said the state has engaged UC Berkeley researchers to study motorcycle crashes to reach better conclusions about motorcycling dangers in general, and lane-splitting in particular. Depending on the Berkeley study results, the state could adjust its lane-splitting guidelines, Pope said. Pete terHorst, spokesman for the American Motorcyclist Association, said the new California guidelines could be used by motorcycle advocates in other states to push legalizing lane-splitting elsewhere. But terHorst said advocates nationally typically focus on other motorcycling issues, including broader concerns about causes of crashes. "We essentially endorse the California position, but we don't promote it in other states," terHorst said. Some motorcycle advocates are leery of the CHP's guidelines. Gabe Ets-Hokin, editor of CityBike magazine in the Bay Area, said he appreciates the state's attempt to make a statement, but worries it could be a first step toward more restrictions on the maneuver. "Lane-splitting is a unique lifestyle to California motorcyclists, a subculture," he said. "If we can do it safely, what is the problem?" He and other advocates contend lane-splitting makes motorcycling safer by allowing riders to avoid dangerous situations in heavy traffic. Motorcycle safety class instructors teach another technique, suggesting that cyclists ride on one side or the other of their lane, rather than in the middle. That way cyclists can avoid the oilier part of the lane, as well as see ahead better and give themselves more avenues to get out of trouble, Covel said. The state guidelines can be found at www.chp.ca.gov under "CHP Programs," by clicking on the headline "California Motorcyclist Safety." It also is viewable at ots.ca.gov, under "What's New at OTS." The guidelines note: • Inexperienced motorcyclists should not lane-split.
• On freeways (when traffic has slowed to below 30 mph), motorcyclists should lane-split only between the two fast lanes. The slow lanes are too dangerous because vehicles there switch lanes more often coming from onramps and getting to offramps.
 • Motorcyclists should not lane-split in toll booth queues.
• Law enforcement officers can, at their discretion, determine that a motorcyclist is lane-splitting unsafely.
• Other drivers should not try to impede motorcyclists from lane-splitting.

Massachusetts - Yarmouth Residents needed to speak Against proposed MC Sound Warrant

$
0
0
OFF THE WIRE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Yarmouth Residents needed to speak Against proposed MC Sound Warrant
24 March 2013
In February, the Massachusetts Motorcycle Association (MMA) learned of a proposal to be raised at the Yarmouth Selectmen Meeting to hear a proposed bylaw concerning Motorcycle Sound Levels.  The MMMA attended the meeting in coordination with the Yarmouth Chief-of-Police and Deputy Chief; the result was convincing the Selectmen that such a Bylaw would be unsuccessful.  The Board of Selectmen voted 4-0 against the bylaw, however the article is on the Town Warrant to be heard at the Town Meeting on April 1, 2013.
Town Warrant Article #36 is to be heard on April 1, 2013 at the Yarmouth Town Meeting and seeks to fine riders $300 if Police Officers cannot see an EPA stamp on the exhaust, even when parked.  In other words, your motorcycle doesn't even need to be RUNNING!!

The Yarmouth Town Warrant can be viewed here:
http://www.yarmouth.ma.us/archives/
This ill advised proposal mimics the Boston Ordinance which was enacted under the cover of darkness without motorcycle representation, but has yet to be enforced anywhere in the Commonwealth.  Further, other attempts to pass such legislation in the Commonwealth have been struck down as illegal to exceed State Law, either by Town Officials or by the State's Attorney General.  Also, as previously noted, the Board of Selectmen, the Police Department, and the Town's Legal Advisor do NOT support this proposed bylaw, but it hasn't deterred angry activists from pounding the Public Relations Drum with misinformation, accusing YOU of being a criminal without the benefit of a hearing.

Article 15

Understanding the 1% Rule: Motivations

$
0
0

OFF THE WIRE

Understanding the 1% Rule: Motivations

1percenterpatch_2What motivates the people who make up the content contributors found in "The 1% Rule?" Perhaps the following story offers some clues. (This is an excerpt from our forthcoming book "Citizen Marketers.")
As a patch, it’s pretty simple: A diamond shape surrounded by a blue border, with "1%" embroidered in the middle. It's worn over the heart by members of motorcycle clubs that celebrate their outlaw status from mainstream motorcycle society. They call themselves the "One Percenters."
The inspiration for the patch and its meaning can be traced to 1947, when members of the Pissed Off Bastards of Bloomington motorcycle club and the Boozefighters Motorcycle Club, showed up in Hollister, California, for that town's annual motorcycle race. As parties involving beer in summer heat sometimes do, things got out of hand.
A photographer for Life magazine happened to be attending the race and snapped a picture of a drunken biker perched atop a Harley Davidson, surrounded by broken beer bottles. The photo was published in Life with a caption that read, "Cyclist's Holiday: He and Friends Terrorize Town." A brief story accompanying the photo said 4,000 members of a motorcycle club were responsible for destructive mayhem. The photo and story provoked the American Motorcyclists Association to denounce the boozed-up bikers. It assured worried citizens that 99 percent of its members were law-abiding citizens, thereby marginalizing the remaining "1 percent" as outlaws.
The story has been the inspiration and founding principle for outlaw motorcycle clubs around the world. One Percenters organize and wear their patches as the proverbial finger raised toward society’s expectations of them. For decades, the story of what happened in Hollister has been repeated by numerous writers in magazines and newspapers, codifying its legend.
William L. Dulaney, a visiting professor at Western Carolina University spent months researching the history of the One Percenters for the academic periodical, "The International Journal of Motorcycle Studies." From months spent conducting field research around the United States, and having spent years as a member of an outlaw motorcycle club himself, he argues that contemporary One Percenters in "outlaw" motorcycle gangs are not necessarily pro-criminal, they are anti-bureaucracy. They rebel against the commonality of mainstream expectations.
Furthermore, the One Percenter clubs are organized around the idea of a community, and their unconventional lives and motorcycle lifestyles are reinforced by the strong-as-steel bonds with other members. They revel, sometimes raucously in beer-soaked pandemonium, in a culture that conventional society frowns on. Forget seeking the approval of conventional governing bodies; the One Percenters revel in their minority status.
They are outlaws of culture.
Dulaney surprises us, though, by debunking parts of the Hollister legend. The photo of the drunken biker? The Life photographer staged it. There was rowdiness in Hollister on that fateful weekend, but police made only one arrest. And there’s no evidence the American Motorcyclists Association denounced the bikers, one percent or otherwise. The source of "1%" was likely due a letter to the editor that Life ran in a subsequent edition, taking the magazine to task for its coverage of Hollister. The letter writer wrote, "We regretfully acknowledge there was disorder in Hollister – not the acts of 4,000 motorcyclists, but rather of a small percentage of that number." Someone, somewhere, interpreted that to mean one percent and it stuck.
Even if the facts about Hollister were off, its premise still resonated with a slice of American culture. Today, earning a One Percenter patch is a badge of social status that continues on in a tiny number of American motorcyclist communities.
That's why their story seems to be an apt analogy to describe a good deal of citizen marketers and their motivations, like someone who spends years blogging about Netflix, or campaigns to bring back a discontinued soda, or takes over the marketing for an upcoming movie, or volunteers to secret shop their favorite fast food chain, or anyone who contributes time and attention to a commercial cause. They, too, are outlaws of culture.
What they do is beyond the norm. Sometimes there is little recognition, but they are dedicated to and protective of their work and the community they're involved in. They excel on the edges of culture even if their percentage as content creators is little more than a rounding error to some companies. Numbers-wise, they are not huge, but the impact of their work can be.
(In a follow-up post, we'll look at the One Percenters and Netscape's desire to hire them.)
Update: This post showed up on the front page of Digg yesterday (thanks Bloodjunkie), and it sparked a -- let's say interesting -- round of 100+ comments within the Digg community. Ian Delaney sorts through some of them.
Update 2: A big hat tip to Colin McKay for the pointer to a story about the One Percenters who are going through a transition in Kansas City. It was his pointer that led us down the path toward this post. I'm a dope for not including a hat tip to him when this was first published.

Resistance is Not Futile

$
0
0
OFF THE WIRE
NMA E-Newsletter #219: Resistance is Not Futile
 
Profiteers from photo tickets, whether camera companies like ATS or Redflex, or the communities who plan on red-light and speed camera ticket revenue to prop up their budget deficits, would have you believe otherwise. They are waging an ongoing (and very cynical) effort to discourage photo ticket recipients from bothering to contest those citations.

What is their strategy? One needs to look no further than a new bill that has been introduced to the California State Assembly. This proposed legislation if enacted would require photo ticket cases across the state to be heard in administrative hearings rather than in courts of law. There are no due process rights afforded to defendants in an administrative hearing. Rulings are made by an employee on the city payroll, not by a real judge. Proponents of civil hearings want to eliminate legal challenges that would surface if the rules of evidence were followed.

In what can only be deemed delicious irony, the California bill was assigned the next number in sequence for the current legislative session and thus became designated AB 666. It didn’t take long before it gained the moniker “The Devil’s Bill."

For a first-hand perspective of the insidious nature of administrative hearings, we checked in with Casey Raskob, a long-time traffic attorney and NMA member. In a couple of decades of walking the halls of traffic courts of New York City and surrounding areas, Casey has seen it all. Some of his observations regarding the inherent unfairness of administrative hearings:

“Administrative means they get to write their own rules, including burden of proof. Once the camera tickets are jurisdictionally moved out of Court, all the nice rules of Court, discovery rules, etc go away. Motions...sorry, we don't have a "track" for motions....FOIA...maybe, but under the rules of the administrative court, no. This certification is enough, you don't need to/are allowed to see the original records, nor can you subpoena the guy who claims to have signed them.

“In New York, camera tickets are "parking" tickets with no points, no insurance hits, just pay at the window on your way out . . . this means that they can suspend your registration for unpaid photo tickets, but with no points assigned or insurance premium adjustment, no one really bothers to challenge the process. They pay the under $200 fine and go away unhappy. We have a rule in NY that you need to be personally served with a summons to get points on a license. Making photo tickets like parking infractions meant that a streamlined system was well established since every jurisdiction already has a parking violations bureau or a parking ticket court calendar.

“I spend a lot of time in "Traffic Violations Bureau" in NYC. Unlike every other court in NY, NYC-TVB, an administrative agency and part of DMV and the Executive Branch, there are "no deals"....there is "no discovery"....there are "no Motions".....you get a 7 minute trial where the cops say the same direct case over and over. Now, the same ticket in Justice Court allows motions, some discovery, and of course, deals.  This is a denial of equal protection, BUT as TVB, unlike real court, cannot put you in Jail, our Court of Appeals has decided it is legitimate, as you are "only" dealing with a license/privilege, and you can't take liberty, unlike the same accusation in Justice Court.

“This is a great backdoor way on the camera merchants behalf to remove headaches......they will seek to form a fake court, write their own rules, and you won't be able to get into real court until you exhaust all administrative remedies. Then, the only thing a Court may check out is "did the agency follow THEIR OWN RULES". All that case law....confrontation....due process....discovery...done away with by the stroke of a pen.

“California’s AB 666 is a follow-the-money bill. I don't know how jammed their courts are with camera stuff in general...it has only been 20 years since I was in CA. Watch to see if the revenue stream is pulled out of "the court system"....I will bet that if they go administrative this would empower a whole money flow, outside the Court system where most of it ends up in "general revenues", but now it will flow....where?”

So what do we need to do to reclaim the basic rights of traffic ticket recipients?

Most importantly, stop the legitimization of administrative hearings before it begins. In California, that means NMA members and civil rights activists alike getting out in full force to defeat AB 666. Our members should watch for upcoming NMA email alerts for more information on how and when to do this effectively.

In jurisdictions that are already treating photo tickets and other moving violations as local ordinance issues, voice your objections (and get your fellow citizens to do the same) to the people who can effect the necessary change – the city council, for instance.

Better yet, contact your area state representatives and get them involved. After all, states typically lose a significant share of the ticket revenue when the locals run routine traffic matters through administrative hearings. State officials have leverage over cities and counties on traffic matters that even the best grassroots protests rarely can muster.

It isn’t that we want the states to get their portion of traffic court bounty. But if the trade-off is giving drivers their fair day in a real court of justice with all of the attendant due process rights and privileges instead of herding them through a kangaroo hearing, that is an easy choice to make.

P.S. You can help us stop AB 666 in California. Visit http://stopab666.org for details on a petition to sign opposing the bill --- you do not have to be a California resident --- and for information about calling California Assembly Member and AB 666 sponsor Bob Wieckowski to protest the selling out of our due process rights. Black diamond (cards)

AUSTRALIA - Anti-bikie laws passed in NSW

$
0
0
OFF THE WIRE
Bikie (*club*) are set to be declared criminal organisations in NSW, with new anti-(*club*) legislation passed by parliament.

Bikie (*club*) are set to be declared criminal organisations in NSW, with new anti-(*club*) legislation passed by parliament.

NSW Attorney-General Greg Smith says the new laws will arm police with new powers in their fight to crack down on organised crime.

"This is the latest in a series of measures to support police in the work against organised crime, which include stronger consorting laws, and increased penalties for drive-by shootings," he said on Monday.

Earlier this month, the High Court upheld a similar Queensland law after the Gold Coast chapter of the Finks bikie (*club*) argued it was unconstitutional and denied procedural fairness.

NSW's amended legislation adopts Queensland's model in allowing for the Supreme Court, rather than an eligible judge, to make decisions on applications to declare an organisation a criminal organisation.

The Supreme Court will also decide what is criminal intelligence. "This will enable police to protect the public from criminal (*club*) whose sole purpose is to commit crimes and terrorise the community," Mr Smith said.

Earlier this month, Prime Minister Julia Gillard announced plans to implement national anti-(*club*) and asset seizure laws.

Mr Smith said that "while we are waiting for details of the federal government's proposal on national laws to crack down on criminal organisations, NSW has workable legislation in place".

http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/1750212/Anti-bikie-laws-passed-in-NSW
Viewing all 6498 articles
Browse latest View live